kadotux

It even kinda looks like the dude’s smiling :D

I unironically like this

My sides

Yeah it requires a minimum of 2GB RAM. Maybe I’ll finally get that picobox

You mean I finally have a way to watch Youtube in my Samsung TV without ads??? Ooooo I know what I’m doing tonight!

edit: naaah it won’t run on my raspberry :(

Answer the questions

I relate 100%

I agree 100%, I’ve had similiar rants :D

Not everyday, but some dishes take time

Somebody once said it to me like this: “If you faceplant into a pile of shit, would you rather wipe your face with a dry paper, or use water for cleaning”

The soundchip on that thing was awesome <3

I can hear this picture

Jesse what the fuck are you talking about?

The horse is already dead.

I honestly can’t tell if you’re serious or not.

edit: I’m not from the US and this seems like a very silly legislation. Unless I’m getting whoooshed.

“Lmao it’s 25 years old at mo…” “Oh…”

Thanks, I could check it out on holidays. Functional Wayland would be cool. I’m a bit skeptic on the qt migration (I had almost continuous issues when the qt4 -> qt5 migration was ongoing)

6 is already coming? It feels like it was only yesterday when 5 was announced. I’m seriously getting old…

Could anyone give a brief rundown of the changes since 4? I really tried to like it but just couldn’t. How’s 5 compared to 4? And is there a preview version of 6 available yet?

I am fixating on the thing that relates to this picture. It seems to me (honestly, I don’t mean to come off as an ass) that your 2nd point of discussion is very much my “muddying the water” point. I don’t want to discuss that point, as that was totally irrelevant here. If I understood correctly, your 2 points were: (I’m paraphrasing, but) “I don’t understand, why showroom owners should let homeless people sleep inside their premises” and “every other economic system besides capitalism also has these qualities”

Right? And I think I have provided arguments against both of these. What am I missing?

The part where you did actually muddy the waters is that you assumed that the picture depicts problems in a “showroom - homeless person” context, which is clearly not the case (as you contradictingly say yourself and even recognize when you said: “when “capitalism” is written on the photo”). The picture clearly criticizes capitalism as a economic system, but you wanted to make the showroom the focus point of the photo. That is muddying the waters. You dismiss the original critique. Or at least that’s how I read your comment. The difference between “I was talking about multiple points” and “muddying the waters” is not that big.

On the other part, yeah, fair enough. I would compare it to a “utopian socialist society” rather than communistic, but sure whatever. I mean there are countries in the world where taking this picture is very easy, and some (socialist) countries where it’s take a bit of effort to find a situation like this to photograph in the first place (most nordic european countries, for example).

The whole point of the image we are both commenting is a critique on capitalism. You are moving the point slightly towards “critique on showroom owners”.

However let’s not get sidetracked here. In a utopian society there would be showrooms, yes. But the person would not be forced to sleep outside without a bed in such a society, be there showrooms or not. That is the point. Capitalism allows this, a socialist society doesn’t (just look at the countries with least homeless people and you’ll see)