• 48 Posts
  • 354 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 24th, 2023

help-circle


  • meep_launcher@lemm.eetoScience Memes@mander.xyzFrog's Gift
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m thinking the outcome of this may be even more sinister.

    I know there is already plenty of corporate hands in science, doing what they can to fund research they want and making it more difficult for potentially damning results to come out.

    Fun wild experiments won’t go away, they’ll still get funded, but only at the mercy of the corporation that bankrolls their study.



  • Oh 100%. This is why I had respect for the party for not running anyone for president.

    I see a lot of folks being critical of the movement due to controversial associations (the Bushes etc.), and while I don’t personally like what these people have done, I recognize passing RCV will mean making strange bedfellows. It’s kinda like when you see AOC and Ted Cruz working together on banning lawmakers from becoming lobbyists.


  • meep_launcher@lemm.eetoComic Strips@lemmy.worldJust Put The Glasses On!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    My comment or the political party?

    Andrew Yang is a billionaire which does suck, but if a billionaire is able to help us get RCV I’ll take it, but that’s just my 2 cents.

    As for me I’d love if my comments were being funded by dark astroturfing money. I got credit card debt that I need to pay. Sadly I still need to go to work.

    Edit:

    Andrew Yang isn’t the one guy funding the party- just like any party they are pulling from many sources, I just assumed the comment was trying to get at the fact a billionaire is setting this up. I had a knee jerk reaction to that because I see purity tests as an unproductive way to judge a movement. There should be boundaries sure, but there should also be a degree of pragmatism in how to get things done.


  • meep_launcher@lemm.eetoComic Strips@lemmy.worldJust Put The Glasses On!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    So I think a lot of folks don’t know the context this comic was written in and how misleading the message is.

    This is an attack comic on a recently created 3rd party, the Forward party, created by Andrew Yang. There are several pillars to this party’s mission, such as UBI and Campaign finance reform, but the core of the party is the ranked choice vote.

    If you aren’t familiar with ranked choice vote, Here is a great video explanation , but essentially it gives voters the ability to vote for multiple candidates and removing the entire “voting 3rd party is throwing your vote away” situation. If the forward party is successful to getting this passed in every part of our government, it would fully upend the two party system.

    This comic is pointing at Andrew Yangs slogan in his 2020 run for president as well as for the forward party- “not left, not right, forward”. What he is trying to do is tap into the discontent found in a majority of Americans. Most voters would like to see choices beyond Dems and the GOP and these voters are all across the political spectrum.

    Someone like my father, a former Republican who is disillusioned with the party but is still heavily free market, and myself who believes more in regulation and strong institutions both agree on the issue of RCV because we are in the same boat of feeling like we aren’t actually represented in our government.

    I’d say this comic is a perfect example of “if you ignore the details of a philosophy and redefine it’s rhetoric, you can make it stand for anything you want”.

    TL;Dr this comic is trying to convince you that the Forward party is the exact opposite of what it really is by ignoring any nuance.

    Edit: Here is a video explaining the positions of the forward party. Keep a critical eye while watching it as I’m not trying to sell you on the party, but at least for you to be aware of it’s existence.



  • I hoped that 2016 was a fluke, that Americans weren’t that dumb and hateful but rather we got caught unprepared by a personality we didn’t expect to run for president.

    I hoped that 2020 was the true thoughts of Americans, that the insurrection represented the dying grasp of an extreme minority.

    I don’t think Trump stole the 2024 election. I think it proved that yes, this is America. Whether you think America has changed into this or was always this, it doesn’t take away the fact that a majority of Americans will believe anything so long as it makes them hate. Good news doesn’t drive votes. Fear and anger drives votes.

    I’ve tried so much to try and be a middle of the road voice of reason and moderation with my friends and family. I didn’t want to be a knee jerk conspiracy theorist, I was always patient with people, listened to them, told them the places they were right, and asked them questions hoping they would ask themselves. I’d say “be like Mr. Rogers. And if someone isn’t acting like Mr. Rogers, be like Mr. Rogers.”

    It started to hit when a friend of mine who is very left wing told me that people with college degrees are brainwashed by the deep state. I had just told her I had a degree in political science.

    I ordered another drink and changed the subject but it hurt. Now I know she is representative of a majority of Americans. I’m worried civil war is all but inevitable when facts just don’t matter as much as anger.

    Edit: Lord grant me the strength to be like Mr. Rogers in this comment section.



  • Yea, what stinks is usually I end up in relationships where I don’t ever feel that infatuation. I always delude myself that the infatuation will come if only I try harder, but that’s a part of why everything implodes.

    I feel like the times I’ve had long lasting relationships, I never felt any immediate excitement, and any time I’ve felt excited, that’s when my heart breaks.