En même temps, avec ce qui se passe aux USA il y a de quoi se poser des questions (en parlant juste du vote populaire).

Sans un système éducatif décent, sans maitrise de l’information, et sans restrictions sur le financement des campagnes, tout part en vrille.

Je ne suis pas de cet avis, mais c’est certainement un système fragile et souvent injuste.

Bitcoin was not «captured» by anyone. The community agreed on not increasing the block size (actually on a slight one-time optimized increase with segwit). Although their use is marginal, there are several Bitcoin-core alternatives (functional node implementations). Both node admins and miners always had a choice. The Bitcoin brand is what the majority of people consider it to be.

Roger Ver is just upsed and can’t admit being wrong. Bitcoin’s most important feature is decentralization. Without it, it becomes censorable and «permissionfull», just like CBDCs.

Note: I did not (yet?) read the book.

They went as far as producing fake documents to cover up their embezzlement, and got busted…

I guess if the copyright trolls got their way, there would be no general purpose computing.

Exactly. These kinds of statements are so naive.

Looking at comments outside of Lemmy, I’m appaled by the number of people shocked by this already. Apparently, “just reuse your f-ing bags” is already too hard for a lot of people. We need to start from the easiest.

If the rocket explosion can create a 60 meters wide crater, my guess is it can still at least crack open the fission part and spill the material in the atmosphere.

Subscribed to your RSS this time, thanks!

Hi, are you running multiple nodes to scale on storage throughput? (just curious)

I use BTRFS for the same. Being able to check for and repair silent corruptions is a must (and this is without needing to read the whole drives, only the actual files). I’ve had a lot of them over the years, including (but not only) because of a cheap USB controller also.

Or use the open-source Minetest instead?

Remove the dot at the end of the link: https://odysee.com/@jopec:7/linus-tech-tips-degoogle-your-life-part-2-adfree-youtube:0

This statement was later retracted. The Engadget article was redacted accordingly.

Unfortunately we are at a point where Cisco Cloudflare and Google are held liable for filesharing-related domains their DNS relays are resolving IPs for…

No, every service provider must remove infringing content when reported. That is not the case on Telegram.

No matter which encoding is used to store data, the hoster is still responsible for it. On mega, the data is encrypted, yet mega is still held responsible for removing content reported by copyright holders (the decryption keys being included in reports).

How come those big hosters get away with such infringements? I guess they must be less popular than Megaupload and such

i2Psnark is an alternative. With a lot less features (and not mentioning the UX)

Thank you for debunking, it’s much appreciated!

A space station with artificial gravity would be a good project, rather than sending a man on Mars just to take a selfie.

It’s so hard to differenciate manipulators from plain idiots 😔