China flooding the market with cheap EVs still makes the rich richer… Just different rich people in a different country.

Looks interesting, but I think a website would be better suited for this (so people can spontaneously play it without having to download anything). Please consider making one :)

Don’t worry, I usually don’t (and I didn’t say “the Jews”, just “Jews” - big difference, since a “the” in front of it would imply that it’s all while without “the” it’s just a part of them).

It just was needed in this context for the sake of my comment (the irony would be harder to understand otherwise).

I apologise

If they really do that the irony of Jews doing ethnic cleansing would be funny if it wasn’t so sad.

What happened to notepad?

1. Rock is in the floor

2. Ice age ends, water floods dirt around the rock away

3. Rock either rolls down or stays

We have lots of these in Austria and at least here this is how they became like that.

I’m no expert so I don’t know what causes more damage, but the production of photovoltaic cells also is by no means environmentally friendly. People die, ecosystems get destroyed, …

And people argue that birds fly into wind generators and die, idk how much damage that is comparatively but probably the least. So from an environmental perspective, as a layman, I’d rank them wind > water > sun > non-renewables (nuclear > gas > coal).

But wind (and sun) always changes, so it’s impossible to only have wind (and sun). You need:

• Something stable that carries a large percentage (for example water in rivers or at the end of lakes (so basically at the start of a river)).

• Something flexible that can quickly be increased or decreased (for example pumped hydro storage power stations, bonus points there for also being able to use energy when there’s too much wind/sun; or non-renewables (burn more gas, get more electricity))

So even if we assume that wind and sun are better than water we still need either water or non-renewables. I’d say that’s an easy choice.

Sadly all power generation methods come at a cost. What would you suggest?

You can argue about how green it is, considering its impact on ecosystems, but how did they end at the conclusion that it’s not renewable?

In the text about Sodom and Gomorra the way I understand it God is punishing them for wanting to rape the angel or whoever it was who’s sleeping there. Not for it being a gay act when men rape a man.

A bit different (since there was no war yet and it wasn’t about the military) but after the assassination of Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo, Austria requested to send their own police to investigate the case around the “Black Hand” (the terror organisation that assassinated him).

It really isn’t unusual for countries to deny foreign investigation.

It’s hard since it could theoretically also be an actual user who used that website themself.

Tausendmal ähnlicher als China

Gehen wir einmal davon aus, dass du Recht hast:

Die USA ist wenigstens eine Demokratie, mit ähnlichen Werten wie wir. Ich bin zwar kein Freund der USA aber würde tausendmal lieber in den USA als in China leben.

Just let π be 3 …

Sustainable energy is heavily subsidised in Europe. Thanks to that we have 80% renewable energy production in Austria (and buy some non-renewable energy from other countries but still, we’re on a good way).

It’s not like antisemitism prevented people from supporting the NSDAP (in many cases the opposite). Sure, when they were elected they didn’t know what to do with Jews yet, but antisemitism was one of the pillars of their philosophy (if the people are unhappy you have to take responsibility or simply point at someone and say “they are responsible, it’s their fault”) and antisemitism has existed since forever. (Of course there were not only Jews in concentration camps but they were initially made for them).

And sadly antisemitism still exists today in many areas of the world.

That’s fundamentally different from steel. We don’t really have an alternative currently. You could use something like aluminium but that’s not environmentally friendly either (in the initial production, for recycling it’s great).

Coal is required for steel, electricty-based heat would only work to lower carbon emissions (especially when recycling steel since you don’t need coal there), but you couldn’t prevent them.

Oh, I thought the Google camera app lost the pixel-specific fine tuning. Nice to know, thanks.