in this case, we know it’s not because they got rid of that option. Why? Because the task is infeasible to support.

You’re not making any sense.

the devs no longer offer it as a supported method

Are you saying that the Home Assistant developers used to support distro packages?

No one is saying it is impossible

OP is saying that. They said it was “infeasible”.

Well, yeah.

Why do you think that because a person could do something they necessarily will?

it isn’t actually that feasible then, otherwise you’d do more than just whine about it on the Internet

So let me get your logic straight: you’re saying that it isn’t feasible because if it were feasible then a person who could do it would necessarily do it? LOL that makes no sense.

you get a philosophical AI that thinks

LLMs don’t think.

Then do if for your distribution then.

I use Debian.

It’s clearly not that difficult, you’ve all but explicitly stated as much.

I have not said that, or anything like it.

Perhaps you missed the fact that I’m not a Home Assistant user and have no interest in contributing?

I’m not a Debian Developer and won’t become one: http://settrans.net/~rah/why-not-debian.html

Also, I’m not a Home Assistant user so I’ve no interest in contributing.

It can certainly happen

What can?

In the US, right now, who holds power is still decided by who gets the most votes in elections.

But a vote doesn’t have an impact.

This presumes that a vote has an impact.

Who is yalls go to

O_o

each party

Who decides who is a “party”?

It biases them towards catering to public demand instead of being a neutral arbiter of justice.

But they’re biased anyway, towards whoever has the power to take away their job. They’re never neutral arbiters of justice.

X Window

Begrudging respect for correct name

Watch The Irishman Suffer

ROFL

PS: https://lemm.ee/post/45711739

“Climate change: UN report says planet to warm by 3.1 C without greater action | Reuters” https://www.reuters.com/business/environment/climate-set-warm-by-31-c-without-greater-action-un-report-warns-2024-10-24/

LOL you jump to conclusions with such confidence

Which would escalate things

ROFL D’YA THINK!

LOL I disagree.

LOL I’m not asking because I don’t understand and I want you to explain it to me, I’m trying to get you to see the error in your thinking.

What holes do you see in the logic of this document?

Here’s from the modlog:

Removed Comment

when he threatened suicide if Betsy did not agree to date him

I skipped to the section on allegations of misconduct and stopped reading here. They just quoted Stallman saying he didn’t threaten suicide and then the (nameless, cowardly) authors immediately say “he theratened suicide”. Despicable. There is nobody to back up Betsy’s side. There’s no response from Betsy to Stallman’s recent comments in the incident. And yet this is the first “corroborated” example they come out with.

This site is another insidious hit piece. I pity the authors that they’re so twisted and power-hungry in their relentless attacking of a man who has clearly suffered for having a different mind to most and yet also contributed so much. Much more, I would guess, than these snakes will ever contribute.

by rah

reason: being a weirdo

If you want to be the BDFL and public face of a large organization, it’s not enough to be technically correct. You also need to be someone who is at least tolerable to interact with.

By the same token, if you want to attack a respected hacker, you need to not talk bollocks.