And if that’s the case, your comment means nothing.

That’s not very socialist of you.

24546982

The majority of men showed changes in behavior before the suicide, especially social withdrawal,

Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10488060/

Or he’s dead.

AOL chatrooms

What a great ad.

That might not work either. If a server marks it as spam, we do something called blackholing the email, meaning we discard the email and close the connection without responding to the sending server. This is done in an effort to provide as little info as possible to a bad actor.

If you don’t send an email from a server and address deemed reputable and with a low enough spam score, you’ll be shut down by more than 95% of the mail servers out there.

There’s really not enough info here to help you. Are you looking for software? Writing it from scratch? Web tool? Bulk or not?

I don’t know how many addresses you plan on testing on any one server but we’ve been on to this trick for decades now and the firewall will block you from almost every server once you try a non-existent address a few times(for my servers, it’s 2). Many servers also report bot/spam IPs to the ISP and if you get reported enough time, your connection could get shut down.

No alts, just some orphaned accounts from moving to new instances.

If they believed what they were saying(paid by individuals, retirees, employees), what’s their justification for not dealing with them directly? What are they trying to say the benefit is of helping a retiree indirectly via a corporate tax break?

Good for you.

No more than any other social network and more likely to be less so. This just seems to be a justification for future government action against the app/company.

Inb4 “They already do that based on what you regularly purchase”

It’s never enough data for them.

I would wager that the group that might have stolen any data is more trustworthy than Tik Tok itself.

Tik Tok AND Paris Hilton? So inrecibly newsworthy!

I’ve hopped instances a few times but have thoroughly enjoyed my time on Lemmy since coming here on the the reddit API change date.

This was incredibly informational, thank you.

We are not rational actors; humans do incredibly illogical and irrational things all of the time. Many of the popular models championed by supporters of neoliberal capitalism completely fail to account for this, instead, assuming rational self-interest.

I think this has made more sense to me than anything else I’ve read so far as of late. If I am understanding it correctly, Capitalism is sold under the guise that companies will only prioritize profit to the point at which it begins to harm some part of society but no further because we all know that would be bad and we’re not bad people when in reality there are bad people that are ok with doing exactly that.

This seems to me like less of an oversight and more of a “we, as tobacco CEOs do not believe that smoking is addictive”, right? The masses may believe differently but those at the top of these systems, companies and law making entities have to know that what they’re doing is putting profit over humans. Were Europeans any better at implementing Capitalism before or is the system impossible or nearly so to protect against this?

That’s an incredibly accurate way of describing what looking at dating today feels like.

My IQ continually dropped while reading this summary and anyone that knows me would tell you that I can’t afford that.

I definitely was due to ignorance, it was not intentional.

That being said, the economic system in place is always at the mercy of those in political power, is it not? I’m not being fecicious, it just seems to me that no matter the conomic system in place, human nature seems to be to find a way to exploit it. I just can’t think of a scenario where that can be protected against.