I’m asking for the individual candidates to lay out their specific political goals. The party can continue to publish its platform and planks.

Then people vote based on whether they want to see those goals met. When those politicians are up for re-election, it’s fairly easy for someone to tabulate whether or not those goals were met. If there are extenuating circumstances (overwhelming opposition, for example), then they can use that to defend themselves. This would help hold their feet to the fire.

As for voting ideologically, I attribute that mostly to FPTP - people feel as though they cannot do anything but vote ideologically because there are no real alternatives. That’s why RCV is extremely important.

shrug Where I live, cars feel (and know) that they’re invincible and likely to suffer no punishment if they kill someone.

Drivers like to think that they can do no wrong all the time, not just when it suits their purpose.

Very true. But as I said somewhere in the match thread: if they play fewer than 30 minutes, it’s basically a training session.

… Did they also mark VAR as not having needed a rating?

Imagine if he scored and everyone just starts singing Country Roads, spontaneously.

Maybe contact the bot maker and ask them to change the way it parses the summoning command? They seemed pretty open to suggestions in c/football.

From Mikel’s press conference:

Do you have any regrets on your actions at Newcastle last year?

M: That’s part of the past and part of the situation that happened. You learn from it and you take a lot of positives as well. We moved on.

Do you think your comments worked?

M: My intention is not that the comments worked. I had to say what I felt on the day.

Have the standards of refereeing improved?

M: They are certainly trying their best.

I’m fully prepared to get fucked back to back.

Timber, Saliba, Martinelli. Who else?

Setford -
Kiwior - Hasn’t started a PL fixture.
Zinchenko - 1 start
Nwaneri - 0 starts, to our chagrin.
Jorginho - 2 starts
Merino - 2 starts
Sterling - 2 starts
Jesus - 1 start

2 starts out of 9 matchdays is hardly “starter” material.

I’ve never heard of transpire being used for the first definition. Perspiration is the act of sweating, and it comes from Latin I think? High school was so long ago.

Incorrect. E-bikes are actually economically viable. Show me an electric motorcycle that actually makes sense to buy.

This might be survivorship bias. If you get hit by a cyclist, you might - worst case Ontario - break a limb or something if they send you flying into something else. If you get hit by a driver, you are definitely going to break something and you will most likely die.

As for how likely it is that you actually get hit - do you think it’s easier to avoid a 2’ x 6’ object moving at 15 mph or a 8’ x 16’ object moving at 45 mph?

You’ve waited years for this moment, haven’t you?

Indeed it is. :) At least I don’t have a space in my name. That’s how you know who the real bots are.

Especially not with a fucking adjective-noun username.

ten Haag is devastated after a) not having to deal with United anymore and b) getting 17M euros. Devastate me please.

3 players from the first 11, one of whom was suspended for the last match?

Surely if someone else comes in for Tavares (long shot, but still), we can sell to them instead of Lazio despite the obligation to buy? I’m not sure how the contracts work.

Yeah, that’s the main issue that Eddie brings up and it’s valid. Definitely need licensing and safety regulations and for Mr. Beast to not be involved. I was speaking purely from an economic perspective.

Good catch. In my haste to be mad at Florida as a state, I overlooked that.

They’re shady af, but they also just make sense. Given that real estate is extremely difficult to procure for restaurants just starting up, why wouldn’t you form a restauranteur co-op? There’s a few “food incubators” (don’t know if I love that term, but w/e) near me and it seems to be a win-win for everyone involved.