• 29 Posts
  • 53 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 30th, 2023

help-circle

  • That’s not what I said. I didn’t claim that Ubuntu invented the idea of a software store. I just said that they add a lot of value to Debian. So Ubuntu’s existence is perfectly justified. And replicating their setup takes time. Especially how their gnome is set up. i have a script that turns vanilla Gnome on any distro into one that looks like Ubuntu’s, so I know.

    Is Linux Mint useless as well? It just preconfigures Debian/Ubuntu to be more user friendly. Anyone can do that on their own.


  • tsugu@slrpnk.netOPtolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldI enjoy creating conflict
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I think you’re far too gone if you genuinely believe there’s no need for Ubuntu.

    Ubuntu has its own kernel, they have a security team making patches specifically for Ubuntu, there’s a tool that detects any drivers your device needs and downloads them for you, and their GNOME implementation is the best I’ve seen. I also like the new software centre in 24.04, displaying both apt and snap packages when you search for them, really fast.

    And yes I know, you will tell me that you can replicate all of this on Debian. And you can replicate basically everything Debian can do on RHEL. So there’s no need for Debian. Ans there’s no need for RHEL since…

    If there really was no point in using Ubuntu, people wouldn’t use it. And yes this applies to Windows as well. Users aren’t braindead idiots. If there is a much better alternative that suits their needs they will use that instead.

    Edit: Also free 10 year support for non-commercial use.



  • tsugu@slrpnk.netOPtolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldI enjoy creating conflict
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    False (except for less packages, that’s true), false, the amazon incident was a honest mistake and only applied to the search bar in unity (even more specifically the amazon lense), and no data is being collected unless you enable it during the install. https://youtu.be/rdPt8WB1lZw

    Also are you serious? A rolling release distro with automated package builds being more secure? Last time I checked Tumbleweed got affected by the XZ exploit.



  • I like Snaps. They can do more than Flatpak and when packaged well they just work. Sadly some apps on Snapcraft are abandoned or they just don’t work, but the same can be said about Flathub.

    Which bridge did they build with snaps?

    Proprietary companies are compelled to release on Snapcraft because it gives them advantages over other packaging methods. I’m just a user but I heard Snaps are easy to work with thanks to the documentation.

    In addition to all of that, Canonical also installs applications as snap when using the apt\£* command line tools.

    Firefox for example isn’t even in their apt repos. So instead of throwing an error, the Firefox meta package installs the snap, and tells you it’s doing that.

    But I understand that Ubuntu isn’t for you if you want to avoid snaps.


  • tsugu@slrpnk.netOPtolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldI enjoy creating conflict
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think it’s just elitism. The worst example is Chris Titus making a video where he explains why you shouldn’t use Ubuntu. And then proceeds to make video explaining how it’s not actually that bad and he uses it with a different DE.

    But now 300K people saw that Ubuntu bad for stupid reasons, from a “reputable” source.
















  • I don’t see how this matters.

    Let’s look at the very worst case possible scenario: Everyone abandons Flatpak and AppImage and moves to Snapcraft, and Canonical decides to make a decision that destroys the store.

    You can still install FOSS apps from somewhere, at worst compile them.

    All that would be lost if Snapcradt stopped existing are the proprietary apps, which you wouldn’t use anyways.