@whale For me it works 🤷‍♂️
(tested with hardened Brave and Mull (hardened Firefox for Android Fork))

@sj_zero Just wanted to share this information, is not a recommendation which search engine you should use. Not everyone feel comfortable with using a search engine which is closed source and owned by a company, some rather wanna use a opensource search engine hosted by a invidual or a group of people, some other people prefer search engines like DuckDuckGo since they work put of the box without problems and have usually a better usability for the modt people, then SearX (or SearXNG) does.

@IronKrill Thats the same thing I think abt you guys, but alright.

@eya May I ask why you think that? I their afe good reasons to don’t use Firefox either…

@themoonisacheese If you think so 🤷‍♂️

@free Yep, thats why people invest a lot of time which have much more technical understanding than you have to create products to improve the privacy problem on Windows, Privacy isn’t a privilege which only a specific group of human is allowed to have, Privacy is a human right and should be accessable for everyone. If you miss the understanding for that, I would recommend informing yourself better then spreading false information.

@smeg You basically missread the article and it basically says, what I already mentioned and the extension is completly opensource I even checked the code myself. 🤦‍♂️

@smeg It seems like you miss the technical knowledge. Let me explain. Bad for security; this extension is so simply made there is basically nothing you could rly exploit and the only thing this extension is able to manage ur other extensions not more. Bad for privacy; it’s not since not every extension can be fingerprinting, only extensions which modify or do things related to the site you access. Websites don’t have by default access to the extensions you have installed.

@LiveLM I agree, I think more privacy extensions should be avaible for both, Chromium and Firefox.

@mrclark @privacyguides @privacy The extension literally can monitor itself 💀 and you can use something like Portmaster.

@staustellsimon @privacy Yea. It’s my typewise, I though about making it
more “standard”, but I decided to keep the personal touch.

@staustellsimon @privacy Oh. Thank you for pointing this out to me.

@ben @privacy Okay, I will investigate this, thanks for pointing it put to me!

deleted by creator

@sexy_peach Okay, got it, ig.

@sexy_peach Thank you very much! Just now wondering, handle WA this differently? Since Ig we all know this message which appears when the “keys” ig, changed

@sexy_peach So when I understood it right (just skimmed the text), the encryption keys changes per message?

@Rose True, but there are still differences, for example Signal encrypts everything, while WA only encrypts chats and calls, so the implementation is a bit different, which maybe could be also in Signal with PFS.

@NightAuthor Skip Redirect can do this, but it often cause also some kind of breakage, Brave has it inbuild so no need there and not sure if Firefox has in it’s config some protection for this