And the DOJ is announcing criminal charges against individuals implicated in such decisions and abuses, right???
/S
And the DOJ is announcing criminal charges against individuals implicated in such decisions and abuses, right???
/S
But in the morning? He’s making waffles.
Store might refuse large bills on small purchases. Doubt they’d put up a fit if you used a $100 to buy $120 worth of stuff.
What’s stopping from vetoing any bill and making it say what you want?
Absolutely no carts n in opeaisles while-galloping
Abortion is legal
(Fucked up a few letters but point remains)
Makes his transmission moen
Let’s say you can get the 2/3 of Congress. Are you really going to get 3/4 of the states legislatures?
Except we keep electing dick heads who literally don’t want to take his money.
Yeah, I think V is the most likely to occur within the timeline specified
But there are checks against their rulings.
Most of their decisions are around laws that can be rewritten to correct whatever negative outcome was seen in the court. This meets your simple majority and presidential signature standard.
For claims of constitutionality there is still a check via amending the constitution… Which is not far from your proposal of 2/3 of Congress. You just also have to clear 3/4 of the states.
I think the problem is the idiots that are supposed to be the check are fully supporting what the courts are doing–and the idiots don’t actually represent the interests or will of the people.
According to Wikipedia this is somehow acceptable and common. It needs to be detectible to the human eye that contact is lost.
Which seems like such a horseshit rule.
I didn’t read the CNN piece as being overly critical. I read it as saying more like “hey she’s not all that bad. She’s actually pretty clever, but lack of trial experience is just bogging down process. She’s learning and doesn’t have anyone to mentor her in her lonely courthouse”
I left reading it a bit pissed off that such a fluff piece was even published.
TFW 911 leaves you on read
One of the issues is if material costs to maintain the property increase steeper than this cap.
Though the solution is pretty practical – cap it at inflation.
But the brands value is in the personality. Killing info wars only creates an opportunity for him to create Schminfo Schwarz with little hiccup. Buying sets and whatnot with business partners is trivial. People make podcasts in their closets at home.
Had them in North Carolina in the 2000s
It’s spelled mammaries
But they’re often the only thing available to correct an injustice. Should civil rights pioneers not have been pardoned?
The second you say not great, but not bad, it’s over.
The threshold is wanting great, so much the maga asshole made it his slogan. Nobody (collectively) wants “okay”