I wish I had a solution. But its the same with all shitty titles, you have to hope people click and read the article/comments in order to get the nuanced information.

This post title is pretty bad. Even the news article says “Scientists use AI [read: machine learning] to [come up with new battery idea]”.

I did that for a while but some features were limited and also required internet. It was also slower in general.

Improvement to Libre Impress or an alternative that is better. PowerPoint is one of the only things keeping windows around for me.

Mine are also literary. They are references to Sanderson’s cosmere series and the names chosen reflect their purpose.

I have an old optiplex SFF which is called Preservation because it has a disk drive for ripping media, it’s a disk wiping station for repurposing drives, and it’s old hardware I’m preserving.

I would never follow what they do in server videos exactly, but I learned a ton from their server video backlog. Also find their server shenanigans very fun. Think server and the occasional actually useful tech tip video are still their best stuff.

Most else feels half baked or falls into the GN video criticism.

Another comparable thing is the retro emulator boxes where they play a couple games and go: “Well, it played games, it’s either fine or terrible. now check out out sponsor!!”

I still really like their server content and the home pool water cooling has been a recent cool series.

Signal killing sms was heart breaking

The only thing I really found, based on a Google search, is that they sold copyrighted data to train AI models. Still bad, but for completely different reasons and that’s a bigger fish than just brave.

But maybe I didn’t find what the other commenter was thinking of.

I’m only replacing my Galaxy S8 because apps are beginning to malfunction and some apps are even emailing me to warn about end of software support for my phones OS, which I cant upgrade because of the age of the phone lol.

I think you would notice a difference between models with the specs you list at the bottom of the post though…

A lot of these comments are missing a large point which is that, if the claim is true, the books are being pirated and then effectively used for a commercial application.

So the authors are losing money through this process and did not give their permission for their work to be used in a commercial way.

The decision of this case will be wildly important for the development of AI.