• Toes♀OP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    What are your thoughts on the alternative path the article talks about “…zeroconf, mDNS, or DNS-SD advertisements”?

    • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      That refers to the fact that printer advertisements can contain lies: When you see a familiar printer name appear on a network, it could always be an impostor secretly pointing to the address of a malicious device.

      So my first advice stands: Avoid interaction with untrusted or potentially compromised print servers.

      To be clear, when I say “interaction”, I don’t just mean printing to them. I mean any interaction at all. Even just browsing a network for printers could potentially mean your system contacts the devices at the advertised addresses, and receives data from them. This Qualys report doesn’t make clear whether this kind of interaction is safe, so I have to assume for now that it is not.

      • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        How do you avoid interaction if it’s being done automatically by your machine when you open up a print dialog, and if malicious servers can use the same names as legit printers?

        • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I suppose I would avoid connecting to untrusted networks, or avoid opening print dialogs while on them, or uninstall CUPS until a fix is available.