• 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/09/26/facebook-russia-trump-sanders-stein-243172

    It’s a well-established fact that a part of her social media campaign was funded by the Russians.

    To be clear: I’m not saying she necessarily did all this in cahoots with Putin. Russia funded divisive ads that boosted Sanders too. Regardless, Sanders quit the race whilst Stein did not. That means she acted as a spoiler candidate, where a vote for her means it’s more likely that a republican candidate wins instead, instead of the democrat candidate that a green voter is likely more aligned with. It’s an unfortunate effect of the two-party system. Nonetheless, those effects are well-known and Stein had a snowball’s chance in hell of getting elected. She knew this, but decided to remain on the ballot anyway. Her candidacy therefore did help Trump win the election.

    • goldenlocks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      Did you even read the article? Facebook presented no proof of this and you just take it as fact.

    • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Sanders quit the race whilst Stein did not. That means she acted as a spoiler candidate, where a vote for her means it’s more likely that a republican candidate wins instead,

      i can do this too!

      Sanders quit the race whilst Clinton did not. That means she acted as a spoiler candidate, where a vote for her means it’s more likely that a republican candidate wins instead, instead of the green candidate that a democrat voter is likely more aligned with.