• FoundTheVegan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s nice. But since he wasn’t elected and isn’t part of the presidental cabinet why should anyone care?

    • morphballganon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the right-wing talking point is that Joe assisted Hunter with what he did, thus Joe is also a criminal, blah blah blah

      • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean that’s certainly spicy speculation, but until there’s any actual evidence of it, we all have way more important things to care about.

      • pan_troglodytes@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        the President has done some… questionable things, possibly criminal, depending on your ideological bent

        what his kids do though? eh

        • TheActualDevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          How can a crime vary by ideology? Criminal implies legalities. How can your ideological point of view change whether or not a law was broken?

          • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean. There’s an entire Supreme Court dedicated to interpretting the USA’s original “law”, the Constitution. They recently reevaluated the meaning of Roe vs Wade. And each judge applies their own interpretation to laws in criminal cases, mostly bounded by prior rulings on the matter only to maintain consistency. Some times laws aren’t so cut and dry.