• AeroLemming@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    7 months ago

    I never had a PS2, so how would I know that? No need to be so hostile!

      • AeroLemming@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Because I didn’t realize there was a critical design difference that allowed 30 FPS to work without causing headaches. I’ve played my fair share of FPS games and have never, ever seen that slow camera behavior anywhere, so how the fuck would I even have any indication that it was present, especially if there was demand for 60 FPS? Lemmy truly is more toxic than Reddit 💀

        • darkstar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          You’re clearly missing the point and the reason why people are upset with your comments.

          They are referencing PS2 games which were slower paced. Low frame rate was not noticable as the game was slower paced. Modern games are mostly higher paced now specifically shooters and so low fps is much more noticable than on slower paced games.

          30fps is more than enough for most games. Indie, strategy, puzzle, etc.

          Some games it’s not enough, most games it’s fine.