The Biden administration for the second time this month has bypassed Congress to approve the transfer of nearly $150 million in military equipment to Israel

Secretary of State Antony Blinken informed Congress that he has made an emergency determination to immediately approve the transfer of “155mm ancillary items including fuzes, charges, and primers that make 155mm shells functional,” a State Department spokesperson said Friday.

The spokesperson said the additional items were added to previous sales, which “increased the total value of the sale to $147.5 million.”

Earlier this month, the administration rushed forward a sale of thousands of munitions to Israel, bypassing the standard 20-day period that congressional committees are typically afforded to review such a sale. The State Department sent an emergency declaration to the oversight committees that more than 13,000 tank shells would be delivered to Israel without any “further information, details or assurances.”

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    Can’t we just bypass Congress to immediately transfer weapons to Ukraine instead? That seems to be 1) the more important conflict, and 2) an actual “morally just” conflict where our support can make a real difference, and 3) an amazing return on investment and a pittance compared to what the Ukrainians themselves are having to sacrifice.

    • manucode@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      The difference might be that Israel has the financial ability to buy such weapons while Ukraine relies on funding from the US and other countries. The White House can probably green lit the sale of arms to Israel but not the transfer to Ukraine as that would involve the government paying on which Congress has oversight. I could be completely wrong though.

      • McDropout@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Israel consistently receives an annual aid package of 3 billion dollars from the U.S., a fixed amount regardless of relative peace or conflict. However, due to the ongoing genocide, they’re receiving extra funds this year. This parallels a scenario where if I give you 10 dollars, and you spend the same amount on something from me, the financial interaction remains balanced, akin to the U.S.-Israel financial dynamics.

      • Lysol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        You have a good point here, didn’t even think about that at first. It’s of course always about the money…

      • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        So far it seems like the president can do just about anything if he just calls it a “major security risk to the country.”

        Biden could 100% get Ukraine their weapons if he really wanted to. Zelensky just keeps forgetting to send a portion of the American taxpayer dollars back to bribe him.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      6 months ago

      The guys over at /Politics told me that It’s impossible to bypass Congress to provide weapons they were extremely certain of it.

      It’s not that Biden only wants to help the Zionists because of the huge bribes he receives from AIPAC.

      Genocide Joe surely has no way to provide weapons to Ukraine other than bowing his head to the Republicans, accepting their demands to buid the wall and waiting until next year.

      He probably just forgot that he can’t do this bypassing congress thing twice this month already. Silly senile old man.

      • that guy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        People forget Joe Biden is a republican, a DINO, it’s why he was saddled with Obama to make him more palatable to voters who saw Obama as too extreme with campaign promises to close Guantanamo, end the wars, codify Roe V Wade, and introduce single payer healthcare.

        After all these years Biden is getting his wish of having a strong republican party. The emperor’s new clothes: there are no sides.

  • HootinNHollerin@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Biden needs to tell Netanyahu to fuck off. Biden is killing his chances at reelection with this. And with that, democracy in America cuz we all know trumps fascist plans. I am fucking furious about this.

    • highenergyphysics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why can’t he just be a normal president and funnel weapons to terrorist enemies of the state using the CIA black account. $150mil is a literal drop in the bucket for DOD cost centers that legally cannot be audited.

      The Dems win one election and throw it all away trying to appease fascists, only for fascists to choose their guy instead and further drive away the left.

      Liberals just can’t stop aiding fascists, real fucking curious how it just keeps happening throughout history.

      Except this time after 80 years of suppression of leftist ideology, nobody is here to fight for the liberals. I’ll watch them get dragged to camps with a smile on my face. Yknow since I’ll already be in the camp anyway.

    • Rolder@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      You’d have to be an idiot to vote for trump regardless of whatever Biden is doing

      • Blaine@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        6 months ago

        Nobody is going to vote for Trump because of this. But it WILL cause enough folks to get dejected and not vote at all, and that’s all it’ll take for Trump to win. Democrats need a candidate people can be excited about voting for, or they WILL lose.

        The “but the other guy is worse!” approach won’t work this time.

      • HootinNHollerin@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I’ve in no way shape or form voted or would vote Republican in my life, lol

        But we deserve another option. I think Biden will lose

    • endhits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      Why are you acting like he’s not doing this of his own desire? Biden is a zionist like 99% of other American politicians. Netanyahu isn’t making him do this. He’s just doing it.

    • chitak166@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      6 months ago

      Think I’m gonna vote for Trump just to shut up Biden’s genocide supporters.

      If they don’t want me voting for Trump, they will have to run someone other than Genocide Joey!

        • chitak166@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          You’d be wrong about that, but I feel like you’re the kind of person to believe whatever he wants.

          • neeshie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            So instead of voting for a 3rd party that’s actually anti-zionist, ur gonna vote for one of the only people who could make the situation worse than genocide Joe?

            • chitak166@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              People keep telling me Trump is in bed with Russia, who is in bed with Iran, who is in bed with Hamas.

              Which is it?

          • BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Thats how beliefs work. They aren’t beliefs if you don’t believe them.

            Trump isn’t pro Palestine either way you are voting for Mr Grab em by the Pussy because you want to what? Own the libs?

  • ShroOmeric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    6 months ago

    Maybe if Ukranians would start committing war crimes they’d be luckier with the US government… just saying…

    • Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      They would need to be doing that to brown people we have no interest in using to maintain the petro dollar.

    • misophist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Israel is trading money for arms. We allow the president to authorize those sales. Ukraine is requesting that we give them shit. Financial appropriations require congress to approve. I don’t think it’s a matter of committing war crimes. If Ukraine wants to buy arms, I think Biden can bypass congress for those sales, too.

  • tills13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Hope bombing brown people in Gaza for a few months is worth losing the republic.

  • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Isn’t this an urban conflict in a dense city full of civilians? How on earth are 155mm artillery shells being justified?

    • BigDiction@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      For use in southern Lebanon? Deterrence for anyone else thinking of joining the conflict?

      Also didn’t sound right to me.

      • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Lemme get this straight. We’ve put significant restrictions on Ukraine using US provided gear, against targets inside of other countries. Because runaway escalation would be bad.

        But we’re supposedly cool if the IDF, then or at some point in the future, without prior approval or permission, uses US hardware against targets inside of other countries? Make it make sense, the justification for both countries is defensive wars against invading neighbors

  • toiletobserver@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Even if they went through Congress, that group can’t even pass gas at this point…

    It was so bad in the last year that npr wrote an article about it.

  • lnxtx@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    What “emergency determination”? Is the IDF losing actually?

  • jasparagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    More info from a different article that provides context:

    Bypassing Congress with emergency determinations for arms sales is an unusual step that has in the past met resistance from lawmakers, who normally have a period of time to weigh in on proposed weapons transfers and, in some cases, block them.

    In May 2019, then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo made an emergency determination for an $8.1 billion sale of weapons to Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Jordan after it became clear that the Trump administration would have trouble overcoming lawmakers’ concerns about the Saudi and UAE-led war in Yemen.

    Pompeo came under heavy criticism for the move, which some believed may have violated the law because many of the weapons involved had yet to be built and could not be delivered urgently. But he was cleared of any wrongdoing after an internal investigation.

    At least four administrations have used the authority since 1979. President George H.W. Bush’s administration used it during the Gulf War to get arms quickly to Saudi Arabia.

    AP Article Link

    As others pointed out, this appears to only apply to arms sales, not for aid packages as in the case of Ukraine.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      More info from The Intercept for even more context on Bidens efforts to get weapons to israel at all cost. Note that Biden does not have a team like this for Ukraine.

      The Pentagon is working to expedite weapons exports to Israel by deploying a so-called Tiger Team of experts to facilitate the transfers, according to procurement records reviewed by The Intercept. Some of the arms sales will be carried out through a new Army initiative designed specifically for the provision of weapons to Israel.

      The Israel-specific program, called the Israel Significant Initiatives Group, is located within the Army’s Defense Exports and Cooperation office, which oversees policy for U.S. arms sales.

      The Tiger Team meets daily with the Pentagon’s Defense Security Cooperation Agency, or DSCA, which executes U.S. arms sales, to overcome barriers to arms sales to Israel. The “tiger team,” a crisis rapid response team involving a diverse set of experts, is supposed to examine potential bottlenecks and delays in weapons transfers and offer advice for alleviating the issues.

      “This shows that at all levels of government, from policy to implementation, the Biden Administration is doing all it can to rush arms to Israel despite President Biden’s recent explicit statement that Israel’s bombing of Gaza is ‘indiscriminate,’ and despite extensive reporting that the arms we are providing are causing massive civilian casualties,” said Paul, who resigned from the State Department in protest of the Biden administration’s ongoing weapons assistance to Israel. “This will not be a proud moment for the Biden Administration, the State Department – or for DSCA.”

      As for the rest of your post, I think the big difference is that those countries actually buy the weapons with oil money whereas israel just gets tens of billions of free dollars from US taxpayers. These “sales” will be refunded to them in a jiffy. They’re likely using a loan to fund it anyways.

      Biden could probably approve a loan to Ukraine and then “sell” them the weapons or use some other legalese BS if he actually wanted to.

      • jasparagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        It looks like there’s some precedent for workarounds that FDR used to aid the UK when Isolationists didn’t want to help during WWII, and that Biden has already been doing a good chunk of it. Without direct cash, I do think there are fewer options, but I’m curious what will happen if an aid package isn’t passed by Congress in early 2024 once the current one runs out.

        Politico: The WWII Strategy Biden Can Use to Bypass Republicans on Ukraine

        Roosevelt’s effort to arm Britain ran the gamut from outright executive fiat (bases for destroyers, surplus transfers) to skillful negotiation with Congress (cash and carry, lend-lease). But there was a common thread running through these maneuvers: The United States never appropriated direct military assistance to the United Kingdom. It traded stuff for stuff. Allowed the British military to buy war materiel from private manufacturers and transport it on British ships. Offloaded “surplus” goods.

        Biden faces a similar set of circumstances. To sustain America’s support of Ukraine, he will need to find creative ways to bypass the handful of GOP congressmen who currently enjoy functional control of the House. He already enjoys some leeway. Last year, he signed into law a latter-day version of the Lend Lease Act, patterned after the original law, that allows him to lease military equipment to Ukraine on a five-year basis. He might also look for ways to use NATO or other allies as a middleman in the transfer of arms.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Yep there we go, good job for finding it out.

          The “Biden can’t do it” is just plausible deniabilty bullshit. Biden is a Zionist that likes doing Nazi shit more than doing something morally correct.

          • jasparagus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Israel received $3.18B in FY 2022 compared to $11.8B for Ukraine.

            USNews - US Aid history

            Edit to add a quote from the link:

            In 2021, U.S. obligations to Israel amounted to $3.31 billion, a figure that saw Israel returning to the top spot among aid recipients that year. But in 2022, the U.S. committed $12 billion to Ukraine in its defense against Russia’s invasion, far exceeding Israel’s $3.18 billion that year. While some figures are still considered “partial,” total U.S. aid globally for 2022 currently adds up to more than $60 billion, a level not seen since 1951.

            It’ll be interesting to see what that chart looks like for 2023 and 2024. And hopefully there’s less genocide all around, eh?

              • jasparagus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                I found more up-to-date numbers that suggest it’s more like 23x the aid (Ukraine:Israel):

                How Much Aid Has the U.S. Sent Ukraine? Here Are Six Charts.

                In any event, the US appears to have sent substantial aid to Ukraine, and it’s in jeopardy only (to my knowledge) if congress can’t get more through in early 2024. My understanding is that the war-specific funding (so far) requested by the Biden administration for Israel has been more to the tune of $14B requested for 2023 (e.g. this article), concurrent with a roughly-quadruple $60B+ request for Ukraine (this article).

                It seems to me that the Biden administration is strongly in support for Ukraine, and is making (and, historically, getting through) requests for continued aid far in excess of those to Israel (which receives multi-billion-dollar aid from the U.S. every year and under every administration). Biden’s only non-standard “funding” here is authorizing sale of arms to Israel, which is in place of any congressional funding due to the unpopularity of the Israel war in the USA (which is unpopular for a variety of, in my opinion, very good reasons).

                To be clear: I’m not suggesting that the U.S.A. should blindly fund genocide. I’m simply arguing that continued (substantial) funding for Ukraine hasn’t been in jeopardy until recently, and that it is still not a guarantee that extraordinary measures (beyond what Biden has already done with the lend-lease-style “loaning” of US Arms to Ukraine, etc.) will be necessary or helpful, given the broad support in the US Congress (to date) for the war in Ukraine. My expectation is that the Democrats in congress will make some concessions to the Republicans in congress, and a Ukraine funding package will pass early in the new year.

                TL;DR: equating the funding of Ukraine to the funding of the war in Israel and using it to suggest the Biden administration hasn’t adequately attempted to fund Ukraine doesn’t make a ton of sense to me.

                • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  Ukraine has been at war since the beginning of 2022. Israel started their genocide only three months ago. Biden is doing everything in his power for israel right now, not for Ukraine. He removed all weapons restrictions for israel on civilian casualties because normally the US wouldn’t even be able to give weapons to such a genocide.

                  The three aircraft carriers next to israel to protect them aren’t even counted under their aid package. Nor is America defending israel against attacks from Yemen. Nor is the direct amount of American intelligence israel is receiving.

                  Israel has barely taken any damage so far and already they are getting 14.3 billion to bombard Gaza with. And israel is getting the high tech stuff not the hand me downs like Ukraine.

                  If a large scale war would develop because of retaliation against israel, there is no doubt Biden would drop Ukraine in a heartbeat and send everything to israel.

                  Currently though Ukraine is fighting a world superpower called Russia with a population of 140 million and a massive gas field economy, while israel is “fighting” Hamas, a group of 30.000 members in a population of 2 million on a small strip of land with zero economy.

                  And they are getting 1/4 the budget for it, direct military aid and priority over Ukraine. Ukraine’s budget seems to also go down by the amount given to israel.