First-of-its-kind US bill would address the environmental costs of the technology, but there’s a long way to go.

one assessment suggests that ChatGPT, the chatbot created by OpenAI in San Francisco, California, is already consuming the energy of 33,000 homes. It’s estimated that a search driven by generative AI uses four to five times the energy of a conventional web search. Within years, large AI systems are likely to need as much energy as entire nations.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    23·
    9 months ago

    The only thing you demonstrated was that you lied. And you provided the link to prove it.

    The first statement was, as I have demonstrated, a lie. The second statement was, as I said, dishonest, because it was a group decision, not a unilateral one, and had nothing to do with hating AI in general.

    So no, you have not shown that to be in any way true. All you have shown is that you are a highly dishonest person who makes scurrilous accusations in order to harm someone’s reputation.

    Badly.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      12·
      9 months ago

      That’s not the comment I was referring to. Here’s a direct link, where you said:

      I think it’s reasonable for a mob to destroy one of the many self-driving cars that have been pissing off San Francisco residents for a very long time now when it tries to drive into them during a big celebration where cars weren’t even supposed to be. Who got hurt here? Waymo? Fuck Waymo.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        21·
        9 months ago

        Yep, still lying.

        I didn’t say-

        I think it’s reasonable for a mob to destroy one of the many self-driving cars that have been pissing off San Francisco residents for a very long time now

        I said:

        I think it’s reasonable for a mob to destroy one of the many self-driving cars that have been pissing off San Francisco residents for a very long time now when it tries to drive into them during a big celebration where cars weren’t even supposed to be. Who got hurt here? Waymo? Fuck Waymo.

        But it is pretty amusing that you pasted a quote yourself that proves what you said was a lie. Maybe you should have cut off that second part to make the lie more convincing.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          12·
          9 months ago

          The car didn’t drive into them. It stopped.

          But re-arguing a week-old thread in a different unrelated thread is likely even less welcome. Anyone who’s really interested can go read it.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            21·
            9 months ago

            What the car did is irrelevant. This is a lie:

            I’ve shown that it is a lie. Even the text you pasted proved that it was a lie. The first part of the post above was just blatantly false, the second part was dishonest. That’s a simple truth.

            Sorry, you’re not going to get me to forget about the fact that you lied by trying to change the subject.