Prop 1 would fund a $6.4 billion bond, of which $4.4 billion would go to sharply increasing the availability of substance abuse treatment, while the rest would build permanent supportive housing for unhoused folks. Half of that would go to housing for veterans with mental illness or addiction.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Oh, crap. I voted for this, and I didn’t realize this happened. I’m in favor of more housing across the board, but shifting the money to locked psych facilities just to add more three day hold capacity is not what I meant to vote for.

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I get where you’re coming from. The issue in California is other states shipping their “undesirables” in because it’s in large part habitable through the year outside. I’m against what is the new asylum system as well, but there are thousands of people here who need legitimate help. What do we do about it?

      • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        The tl;Dr answer is build more housing. The long answer is that we need better urbanism. Our cities are awful, and have been for a long time, and the best and worst part is that it’s a consequence of seventy years of deliberate and terrible policy choices. It’s terrible because we’ve been choosing for almost a century to have the shittiest cities in the developed world while thinking that it’s completely normal. It’s great because the problem really is as simple as working to reverse these policy choices and their consequences.

        This subject really deserves its own book (or even series), but the series that NotJustBikes did with StrongTowns is a good place to start.

        https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLJp5q-R0lZ0_FCUbeVWK6OGLN69ehUTVa&si=R2TD6rICxWvUAIvs

        We can have more affordable, more livable cities, it’s just a matter of making those choices. The great news is that for most Americans, these aren’t policy choices that are as out of reach as, say, universal healthcare. A lot of these policies are controlled at a municipal or county level, and can be affected by your city council. Try showing up to a meeting once in a while and making a public comment; they don’t know what people want without us telling them, and the people who want awful cities are vastly overrepresented. It’s easier than you think and the cops can’t stop you.

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Asylums and care facilities that you cannot leave are not inherently bad. I was made to stay in one for a few days in my early twenties, against my will. But it was a valuable few days, and as much as I wanted out it was, overall, a positive experience that benefited me.

      There are people who need care in facilities they cannot leave. Those facilities must be regulated and held to a high standard, but psych facilities need to exist.