Although the spectacle of influencers flaunting their affluence has long been a staple of social media, there are signs that audiences are growing tired of it. Experts say “influencer fatigue” is wearing on young people who crave authenticity as inflation rises and achieving a stable livelihood becomes increasingly difficult.

According to data from a YPulse study shared with Yahoo News, 45% of people between the ages of 13 and 22 say influencers just don’t have the same power that they used to. About 53% said they were more likely to trust recommendations from regular people online whom they don’t know rather than creators with large followings.

Influencer marketing once offered an alternative to typical celebrity marketing. Celebrities appeal to us as salespeople because of the psychological phenomenon known as the halo effect. If someone is talented or beautiful, we assume they are highly qualified in other ways as well, which boosts sales. Influencers, who are powerful but not conventionally famous, offered a more relatable and accessible alternative. They’re far enough removed from celebrities that we can relate to them — until we can’t.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Can you name a single Lemmy power user who’s shilling something? the biggest users I can think of on .world are just posting Star Trek memes.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Shills aren’t a requirement for social media.

          Also it was kind of a joke. Lemmy is a social media, but it also socialist by the definition of the word. The joke enhanced by the fact that most the instances I’ve seen lean hard to the left.

          a political and economic theory of social organization which that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.

          I suppose you could say the same about most the fediverse.

          But give it time. Lemmy isn’t popular enough yet, but eventually there will be plenty of “users” exploiting the algorithms for financial or political gain. Lemmy hasn’t reached the critical mass necessary for that to be worthwhile.

        • girl@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          that isnt a requirement for something to be social media. lemmy is definitely social media, it’s better than most but still qualifies

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Different people have very different ideas of what social media is. No one really thinks of the old bulletin boards as social media, but if Lemmy is social media so are they. Some people only consider effective platforms for advertisement as real social media. For me, it requires some form of algorithm dumping shit down your throat or people over sharing.

            • girl@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I understand the connotation, most people only consider things like youtube, tiktok, and facebook social media. but there is an actual definition for social media and even the old chat boards fit that definition

      • nifty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Internet forums were never social media. Link aggregators are a substitute for niche Internet forums.