• KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      9 months ago

      i would argue that you probably lean more on the side of sharing user rights and freedoms generically. Rather than the more specific “software and ideas”

      You can certainly have different opinions relating to guns. But they do have a fundamental overlap of underlying concepts. Rights are rights at the end of the day. Either you have them. And they’re justified, or you don’t, and none of them are.

      • Enkrod@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        Rights are what a community agrees on that they should have. I’m happy my community has agreed that owning guns is a priviledge, not a right. There is no sufficient reason owning guns should be a right, so I can be completely in favour of rights and freedoms without including any right to own guns.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          i mean, technically if we’re arguing that it’s a privilege more than a right. That wouldn’t really change the point being made here, considering that legally, the government does have the ability to prevent you from owning a gun. Minor semantic shenanigan though so meh.

    • Lemmy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Well, that’s hard to do when your government are the only ones with guns and power.

      • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Innocent lives lost due to “law abiding citizens” mishandling guns: a metric shit ton

        Corrupt governments toppled by gun lovers: 0

        The thought of how many people might be stocking ammo and thinking to use out if their favorite politician loses makes me happy for having an ocean between me and them.

        • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          You don’t understand. They mean they want to topple democratic societies in favor of theocratic fascism.

          Peace is the enemy.

          These fuckers never stopped waging the civil war, that’s what this is about and was ever all about.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Corrupt governments toppled by gun lovers: 0

          i mean, in a sense. That is why the US exists today. The british are well known gun fanatics.

          • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Ahh, the typical Reddit old tradition of vague statement of knowledge with no meat to not be rebutted. Had hoped that didn’t reach Lemmy.

            Lightning round. Russia? Ha! China? Ha! North Korea? Japan? Ha! Netherlands? Hahahaha

            USA…? Hahahahahahhahahhaha

            • Urist@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              The US might prove true if you include gun nuts toppling their own government by voting for fascist scum.

            • ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Do you like the two party system? Do you like the electoral college? Do you like the lack of accountability your politicians face? I’m assuming you must assuming you’re a gun owner who hasn’t tried to liberate the US

        • Lemmy@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          9 months ago

          What about the innocent lives lost because they didn’t have a gun? You think everyone can fight with their bare hands or a knife?

          • Urist@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Who do you even need to fight bro? If I was say getting mugged I would give them all my valuables save a 10 % tip that I could give them when I was allowed to run the hell away from there. Do not be a stupid macho idiot. Be a smart coward without neither a wallet, gun nor a fatal wound.

            Jokes aside, the main uptick is the smaller chance of someone less mentally stable than you with less to lose also having a gun.

            • Lemmy@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              So what about when you are getting raped? What about when someone doesn’t want to let you go? Do you know what its like to almost be murdered?

              If you want to say “Why do you even need to fight bro” you’re basically just saying good luck to all the people who can’t defend themselves and just letting them die. And do you not understand how regimes come to light? Just take a look at Russia, Putin just got to serve for another 6 years. Do you wonder how somebody stays in power for 24 years and more? Because nobody can fight back.

              • ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                9 months ago

                How are you supposed to go an get your gun from the locked cabinet where I assume you keep it to prevent a psycho from stealing it and using it against you? Unless you keep it attached to you at all times risking a misfire or your attacker grabbing it and using it against you. What if you accidentally kill someone who was infact innocent when you think you’re doing the right thing but you misjudged a situation? How do I know that you can be trusted with a firearm? What distinguishes you from a school shooter just by looking at you? If the US is so free why don’t you fight back against the corrupt two-party system?

              • current@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Russia has pretty high gun ownership… comparable to Europe/Australia and not far from Canada. The US has like 4x the guns per capita as the next highest countries, and it’s far from the most free.

          • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Owning a gun makes you more likely to die by gun accident or by that gun being used against you. You logic is completely wrong.

            • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              You think these people care about logic? Wait until you hear who they are voting for and their reasoning for it.

          • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            If a country like the US had a lower violent dead per capita than other first world countries like France or Germany, I would agree with you. But given that the numbers are 3 to 6 times those of EU countries, it doesn’t seem to be working.

            Still, if you want to quantify how many lives were saved in any given year I can give you how many innocent ones were lost. Hard to measure, you say? Then it’s a weak arguments based on feelings not facts.

            • bcoffy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              If a country like the US had a lower violent dead per capita than other first world countries like France or Germany, I would agree with you.

              It doesn’t have as high of a gun ownership rate as the US (no one does), but Czechia has some of the laxest gun laws in Europe, including allowing the concealed carry of a handgun like the US (at least 1 million Czechs have permits to own a firearm, a large portion of which conceal carry them for self defense) and they have a lower homicide rate than Germany or France (Source: World Bank)

              Even as a supporter of gun rights, I don’t think that definitively proves that guns, on a societal level, prevent deaths. I don’t believe that in general. I do believe, however, that on a personal level, a well trained individual who sees the need to defend themself or people they love can prevent harm by owning a firearm. I do also believe that in a society (America) with a broken policing system, and an increasingly authoritarian Republican party that wants to crack down on my rights and the rights of people I love, I’d like the option to protect myself and my friends/family.

              • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                The more knives people use, the more people get cut.

                More guns = more gun violence.

                How fucking hard is that to comprehend?

            • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              “We have dug this hole for ourselves so deep we can’t get out of it. At this point our chances are better if we keep digging straight down, it has to bottom out somewhere, right?”

              / The words of a truly dying society

        • Rediphile@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          9 months ago

          I struggle to see Japan as a bastion of freedom lol. Fun place to visit for sure, but between the archaic drug laws and suicide forests I’m not sure they are a society others should be modeling themselves after.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s better when it’s the government with guns against criminals, randos, and children with guns.

        More guns is always the solution. If it only causes more violence and bloodshed like a tribal civil war in the jungle then you clearly did not get enough guns.

        Plus, they’re FUN! People forget that it’s FUN to shoot guns. Isn’t that worth a dysfunctional society crippled by violence and murder?