• BertramDitore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    For fuck’s sake, don’t risk it. Why risk it? Retire with dignity and humility, and allow someone who’s not batshit crazy to be your replacement. Anything less is selfish.

    Lifetime appointments have got to go.

    • cabbage@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      She’s only 69 though. Four justices are younger than her, three are older. She’s closer in age to Kamala Harris than she is to Joe Biden.

      I get the concern, but at some point it gets silly.

          • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Not at the moment but it does mean she might suddenly die during the next presidential term.

          • AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 months ago

            If we had a different process for appointing justices, her age/health wouldn’t matter as much. The problem is that if she dies during a conservative presidency, our already skewed supreme court becomes a radical supreme court, because a Republican will appoint a very conservative justice.

            The United States leans left (~54% I believe), but even if the nation is a 50/50 split, a supreme court that is 6/9 far right already wildly misrepresents the people. 7+ leaves most of this country without a voice.

          • xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Disregarding if it would be a good idea to retire for other reasons; If she needs another person to assist her to do her job, I’d say she can’t do her job.

            How many other jobs would allow a worker with a personal medic on standby?

      • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        … Think about your first sentence for a second.

        I understand the point of it is to demonstrate how likely it is for her to continue living another 5-10 years, but stop for a second and consider…

        She’s ONLY 69 years old.

        Nearly 7 decades.

        And the median American is currently just under 39 years old according to my 20 second googling.

        Thats fucking insane to me.

        And she’s not even the oldest, nowhere near the oldest in government. The median age of senators is apparently around 65.

        I already don’t understand kids these days half the time, there’s exactly 0 chance of these people understanding me

        • cabbage@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          8 months ago

          I think this is a huge problem in American politics, and Americans really need to get around to elect younger officials asap. Obviously it’s not that easy, and the problems run deep.

          The supreme court, however, it’s the one institution that’s kind of intentionally old. They are supposed to be experienced ageing justices at the end of their career.

          The problem is not that the supreme court is old as much as that politicians are even older.

      • Akasazh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Retirement age should be mandated. 65 spend time on whatever, not work.