An Israeli missile has hit Iran, two US officials have told the BBC’s US partner CBS News.

Iranian state media is reporting that flights have been suspended over several cities, according to Associated Press.

Iran has been on high alert after Israel said it would respond to an Iranian attack against it on Saturday night

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’m not prepared to be the kind of asshole to condemn a whole race of people. The majority of Germans supported Hitler and then the war ended and they’ve gotten a lot fucking better.

      I’d be happy to accept any Isrealis that are willing to abandon ship.

      • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        46
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        not a race. fuck that racist bullshit.

        if they already left; vet their shit, make sure they’re not still affiliated, and sure. dont hold the shit hole they were born in against them. but starting now, when they’re just afraid? nah. main lesson from world war 2 was we didn’t kill enough Nazis.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          However you want to group or define Isreali citizens you are making a too broad generalization.

          • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            36
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I don’t really care? they have been unwilling to stop for longer than I have been alive. they’ve been offered the moon,and turned it down, because they prefer genocide. they haven’t stopped. they haven’t had substantial internal strife or attempted revolutions or internal assassinations of particularly warmongery leaders.

            their soldiers literally sing while they do atrocities, their prime minister says it, their citizens say it, their children say it.

            Not a single joule of energy should be wasted attempting to preserve “Israeli” life. not ever. to do otherwise would be an insult to their victims. stopping this genocide and world war three must come first.

            I dunno, maybe you think 1 genocidal pedophile life is worth global thermonuclear war. I guess agree to disagree?

              • machinin@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                8 months ago

                Call it the the genocidal problem. The issues isn’t with Jews in general, just people who are carrying out and supporting the genocide. I would lump Biden in with them as well.

              • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                8 months ago

                not a Jewish problem. a Nazi problem. nothing makes Hezbollah look good quite like hebarrah does.

              • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                you saying theres a way to stop world war 3 without glassing that shit hole?

                and stop saying Israelis are Jews. they’re not. they once rationalized an internal purge by saying ‘if you kill other Jews for political reasons, youre out’ to kill other Jews for political reasons, then did the whole white supremacist sterilizing of Ethiopian Jews. they are not. they do not count. and even if they did, Jewish communities ive spoken to feel, at best, mildly embarrassed by them.

        • ElmerFudd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          The Germans during WWII actually were referring to nationality when talking about race, so that one slides believe it or not.

          • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            its so much dumber than that. it kind of comes down to mystical bullshit and oh hey, that’s in this one too

            but theres this kapo trash tendency to draw equivalency with all Jewish people in the world and smear their crimes onto the innocent

        • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          Jews are an ethnic group, culture, and religion, but not a race. It’s a common enough misconception spread via the media. Also any given Jew is not necessarily all three.

          The lesson from World War II is that war can only delay the spread of an idea, but not destroy it. Ideas have to be fought with other ideas. Killing Nazis only bought us time to think of better ideas, spread them, and deradicalize people. Thanks to conservative propaganda networks and social media, we’re on the verge of a fascist takeover. We are in an information race against fascists. The fascists are turning the US into a christofascist dictatorship, by controlling the narrative and driving the news cycle, not by killing anyone. We have to beat them in this race to stop them.

            • june@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              I’d be willing to bet you could find one or two Israelies (Israelites?) that hate Israel too.

            • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Israeli is not the same thing as Jewish.

              Yes, I am Jewish, but not Israeli. I assumed most people referring to Israelis as a race are referring to Jews a race. It seems weird to confuse nationality with race in the 21st century.

              Many Jewish people hate Israel.

              I don’t hate Israel, because hating Israel is more taxing to me than it is to Israel. I think Israel is an apartheid state that’s committing genocide and war crimes in Gaza, Zionism is a fascist ideology, the current Israeli government is dominated by fascists, and that the concept that we need a Jewish ethnostate in order to be safe is ridiculous. Israel needs to change radically and it needs to change as soon as possible.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            “Race” has no biological definition. Star Wars fans can be a race if you want them to.

            • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Typically when people are saying Jews are a race, they referring to the idea that Jews are not White, as in they cannot be White. Jews can be White, but they can also be Black, Native American or Hispanic. Jews are not in a racial category that excludes them from being part of these groups. That’s what I was referring to when I wrote race.

              That’s not really the main point, I was agreeing with the person I responding to and adding some clarification. It seemed to have distracted from the issue at hand.

              Killing people isn’t how we stop the spread of fascism in the modern day. We need to spread information, for example, that fascism is a self-destructive ideology that will destroy hundreds of millions of lives and that the Republican Party is controlled by fascists. I think most people know that on lemmy, but there are plenty of people who will check into politics in the months leading up to the election and form their opinions then. A misconception I see on lemmy is that some people assume we can defeat fascism with guns alone. That isn’t going to cut it. We have to reach more people with true information before fascists reach them with misinformation. Once a person forms an opinion they are unlikely to discard that opinion when presented with new information in the short term. That short term can easily last until the election, so these months leading up to the election are crucial. edit: capitalization

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Breeds are used to refer to domestic animals where artificial selection was used to exemplify specific traits.

                Are you saying that the traits of different “races” were artificially selected for? Who was doing the selecting?

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    But please, do tell me the real definition.

                    (Note that it says there’s no scientific definition of breed either.)

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                8 months ago

                By Alan Templeton.

                According to Templeton’s research, perceived differences in races are more related to cultural perceptions and biases than any underlying genetic reality.[5] For example, Templeton’s statistical analysis of the human genome shows that much greater genetic diversity exists between populations of chimpanzees than humans from different parts of the world.[3]

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Templeton

                Do you think maybe you’re misunderstanding him?

                • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  It think it’s debatable about how you define Races, but it’s also quite obvious that biological races exist. There are specific differences in the physical biology that separate the races, and common traits among them that identify them as part of the group. Skin color, hair type, bone structure, genetic predisposition to certain diseases, etc. Physical traits are passed from the parents to the children, and when the parents are of different races we get blending of the characteristics and so on. Some Native Americans even have different kinds of teeth than European-Caucasian descended folks do.

                  Basically it’s not something you can choose or change, it’s an immutable biological set of characteristics. I don’t know what “race” the Jews in Israel are exactly but I suspect it depends a lot on the region their ancestors are from. Many of them might even be the same “race” as Palestinians.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    What’s the race here, African or Melanesian? And if it’s the same race, why are they so separated geographically?

                  • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    No, and you fundamentally misunderstand biology, genetics, and race.

                    In essence, per Robert Saplosky, race is a cultural construct, not a genetic or biological one. He has his entire Stanford lecture on human behavior including human genetics on YouTube. He also has several books explaining this. Here’s a link to a summary video: https://youtu.be/YVT5iIXdjek?si=jXKvfd3fUEdQcjMx

                    Just because you can reactively type people into races, doesn’t make race a real biological phenomenon. There are plenty of races that look like others, plenty of admixture that ruins your theories. Sickle cell anemia can exist in white people (people who appear to look white) who have black ancestry, but you wouldn’t know they have either sickle cell or black ancestry from looking at them. Because race ISNT genetics. There are people within the same family who are different races, one who is lighter and one who is darker, etc. And melanin production is only one small component of the cultural cues we see as someone’s race.

                    Again, it’s not biological and no real scientist would think that.

              • voracitude@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                From your source:

                Humans have much genetic diversity, but the vast majority of this diversity reflects individual uniqueness and not race.

                And

                The question of the existence of human “races” now becomes the question of the existence of human subspecies.

                … One definition regards races as geographically circumscribed populations within a species that have sharp boundaries that separate them from the remainder of the species (Smith, Chiszar, & Montanucci, 1997).

                … A second definition defines races as distinct evolutionary lineages within a species. An evolutionary lineage is a population of organisms characterized by a continuous line of descent such that the individuals in the population at any given time are connected by ancestor/descendent relationships.

                And

                It is critical to note that genetic differentiation alone is insufficient to define a subspecies or race under either of these definitions of race.

                You seem to have linked something that argues and shows the opposite of what you intended there, bud.

                • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Did you miss the whole section with the tree of races, showing the genetic differences in them? Maybe you didn’t make it all the way through?

                  • voracitude@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    I think you might have just skimmed it. Throughout the paper the authors include examples of “race trees” which they argue have no places in scientific literature because they do not apply to humans.

                    I have an idea. Why don’t you quote the section that proves your point. If I can’t rebut you by copying and pasting context from the same paper, you win. Deal?

                  • feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    It’s ideology for these people. Lysenkoism all over again. Meanwhile the existence of genetic subgroups, however hazy and overlapping they might be, remains extremely relevant in medicine - which they’d also be quick to point out in different circumstances.

                    I get their motivation - the idea of there being 3-5 rigid classes of human that should be treated differently is ridiculous and sinister. But are there distinct genetic lineages? Absolutely, you can track human migration that way, it’s very interesting.

                    A lot of the disagreement seems to come from conflation of the word “race”, which doesn’t really have a firm definition anyway. To some people in the USA it refers to this strict division of humans into absolute categories, but if you’re not predisposed to think that way it’s just shorthand for ethnic or geographical heritage.

                    Globally, this heritage is something people still consider very important; whether rightly or wrongly is not for me to say. But that definitely lends an irony to the whole discussion. Being simultaneously obsessed with identity categories while claiming they don’t exist is par for the course nowadays, I think, at least in parts of the USA.

          • machinin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I thought one of the best lessons was that you don’t deal with an aggressive and genocidal nation through appeasement.

            We should be fighting against Israel, not appeasing them.

            • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              I thought one of the best lessons was that you don’t deal with an aggressive and genocidal nation through appeasement.

              That was also one of the lessons. It’s why we are sending weapons to Ukraine to fight Russia and plan on defending Taiwan against China.

              We should be fighting against Israel, not appeasing them.

              It would be a lot easier to do that if we hadn’t be allied with Israel for over 75 years. It’s not normal for allies to turn on each other like that.

              Regardless, there can be more than one lesson from a historical event. Fascism is an idea. It has to be fought with other ideas.

            • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              that was the lesson from the start. that theres one way to stop fascism and genocide both.

              the lesson from the end was: you didn’t kill enough fucking Nazis.

          • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            who the fuck mentioned Jews here?

            I’m talking about Israelis, cut your equivocating antisemitic bullshit. talk like that gets people killed by idiots who can’t tell the difference, but know genocide is bad and Nazis dying is good.

            we didn’t stop Nazism because we didn’t kill enough Nazis, on either side of the ocean. the fuckers who got social media in on it can be traced back to that. if we’d killed more Nazis then, we wouldn’t have these problems now.

            • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              who the fuck mentioned Jews here? I’m talking about Israelis, cut your equivocating antisemitic bullshit.

              If someone refers to Israelis as a race I would assume they are confusing Jews, an ethnic group, culture and religion as a race as opposed to confusing Israelis, a nationality, as a race.

              we didn’t stop Nazism because we didn’t kill enough Nazis, on either side of the ocean. the fuckers who got social media in on it can be traced back to that. if we’d killed more Nazis then, we wouldn’t have these problems now.

              Even if we had killed everyone who was a Nazi, the ideas could be still be spread by people who are not Nazis and then internalized and adopted by a new group of Nazis. Ideas outlive the people came up with them and believed in them. The best that would do is kick the can further down the road, but we still have to deal with this problem eventually.

              • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                don’t think I referred to tfem as a race but I could have. I’m not super likely to bother scrolling up for a hezbarite though.

                the ideas could have been spread by people who weren’t Nazis, but were I’m this actual extant timeline spread by actual Nazis.

                american civil war was the same. every one of those slaver families needed to die. every adult, and possibly the children, if they weren’t adopted out (possibly to the people who should have got the property and would have done the raising if the slavers had won anyway). yes that’s technically genocide, but I’m saying it should have happened to some of my shitty ancestors, and I still think I’m right. that culture of keeping human beings imprisoned as chattel slaves needed to die, and because we left them alive; it didn’t.

                • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  don’t think I referred to tfem as a race but I could have. I’m not super likely to bother scrolling up for a hezbarite though.

                  I was referring to the poster above you.

                  the ideas could have been spread by people who weren’t Nazis, but were I’m this actual extant timeline spread by actual Nazis.

                  My point is that killing all Nazis wouldn’t have prevented Fascism from spreading.

                  american civil war was the same. every one of those slaver families needed to die. every adult, and possibly the children, if they weren’t adopted out

                  Killing all slave owners wouldn’t have stopped the Lost Cause of the Confederacy myth which is responsible for the confederate sympathizers we have today. The myth is an idea and can be spread by people who don’t own slaves.

                  • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    was referring to somebody else

                    so why are you arguing with me?

                    killing all the Nazis wouldn’t have stopped fascism

                    hard disagree. it would have stopped. maybe somebody would have dug it up later and started it back up, but it would have stopped.

                    killing the slavers wouldn’t have

                    I met them. their grandchildren and great children, at family reunions. they worked hard to craft and propagate these myths. they were proud of it. expected their grandchildren to keep it up.

                    now, me noping out isn’t so much fix as those first couple generations did damage, abd that’s why I think they should have been killed. every single one.

        • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          How does refusing asylum to working class Israeli refugees advance the class war or stop genocide?

          • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’m sorry but being a laborer doesn’t magically make someone my friend.

            genocide is genocide, and they all participate. not one joule.

            • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Do they all participate though? A coworker of mine is in Isreal right now caring for her mother, she grew up in Isreal and was staunchly antiwar. She’s once again an Isreali resident - does she deserve to die?

              Do the three year olds deserve to die to? Do they deserve to be made orphans?

              Please realize that you’re so far gone that you’re advocating for the erasure of a state… your stance is one that Netanyahu would applaud.

              • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                its not about deserving to die. its about going literally an inch out of your way to save one while stopping a genocide. which you shouldn’t. saying otherwise is an insult to their victims.

      • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        no. that isn’t to say they should be killed, but wasting a joule of energy to keep one alive is a waste.

          • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            you commit a genocide, you are no longer the priority. your victims come first. everyone else comes first. you are no longer human.

            if they want to save you, your victims can do it. but literally every other person on earth gets falgsc before I offer you a grain of rice, or steer my car out of the way to avoid hitting you.

            honestly, a policy where food etc aid is only allowed to these genocidal monsters through Palestinians is pretty reasonable. it would be a way to beat some humanity into them, but they must be allowed to die, so the Palestinian people’s goodwill is the only way they survive.

            • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 months ago

              Never in the history of the world has grouping literally everyone of a particular group together has gone poorly, except for all the time. To say every Israel is culpable is factually untrue. Hold the accountable accountable.

              • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                only way to stop the genocide.

                so who would you rather share a world with?

                genocidal warmongering ghouls whose reproductive cycle falters without attocies, who are edging on world war three?

                or Palestinians? because I would rather have Palestinians.

                if you don’t like this choice, you should have stepped on the bastards 20-50 years ago.

                • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I’d rather share the world with people who don’t want to eradicate others.

                  • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    so Palestinians. you choose to share the world with Palestinians rather than genocidal monsters who jack off about starting world war three. same, honestly. they seem at worst indifferent.

                    which means, unless you kill the monsters, there will be no more Palestinians.