An 11-year-old Wisconsin boy accused of murdering his mother has been ordered to stand trial.

The boy is charged with first-degree intentional homicide. The district attorney’s office is seeking to try him as an adult. The court has ordered that the boy’s name not be revealed because he may still be tried as a child.

In July, the court found the boy competent, according to court records.

Milwaukee Detective Timothy Keller testified in court on Tuesday about speaking with the boy about his mother’s death.

The detective said he questioned the boy the next day and the then 10-year-old boy admitted shooting her but called it an accident, according to WISN.

“[The boy] stated that he took up a shooting stance and was pointing the gun at her as she was walking towards him and asking him to put it down. And that’s when he indicated that he fired the gun with his intent to scare her by shooting the wall behind her,” Keller testified.

“He had made a purchase on his mother’s Amazon account for some virtual reality goggles the morning after this homicide occurred. And [family] were concerned because he had had an argument with her about whether he could have these prior to the homicide,” Keller said.

  • hill@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    So by your logic and reasoning this poor woman apparently committed suicide(?)!

    Yes he’s a kid but he also resides in a state where anyone committing this crime is tried as an adult - that doesn’t mean that he’ll go to an adult prison if the outcome is prison time. If you read anything about it you’ll know he’s a straight-up psychopath and needs serious mental help!

    • creamed_eels@toast.ooo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you read anything about it you’ll know he’s a straight-up psychopath and needs serious mental help

      Source? Because the above article didn’t contain any of that info.

    • zaph@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you read anything about it you’ll know he’s a straight-up psychopath and needs serious mental help!

      So he needs help and not to be tried as an adult making decisions with a clear mind. I love it when people disagree with themselves in 3 sentences or less.

    • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      So by your logic and reasoning this poor woman apparently committed suicide(?)!

      Lol, what?

      Negligence is not Suicide. Suicide is intentional. If she put the gun in the childs hand and forced him to shoot her with her own hands, that would be suicide.

      But negligence is what its name implies… Neglect.

      If you are an idiot and accidently kill yourself, do you think that is suicide? Obviously not, right? You are of course still responsible for having done it, but an accident != suicide.

    • HubertManne@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the OP was under the impression the child would not be charged but the parent would if they had shot anyone else. In that circumstance he made it would not really be suicide as much as an accident I think. Like accidentally shooting yourself due to negligence in handling the firearm but here the negligence is allowing access to a child.