• interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    25 days ago

    I’m not really including paywalled media in this. I’m not subscribed so I really don’t see any of what you mention. What I’m seeing in my browser windows is almost completely sterile. The only place I see sex, is places that are ONLY about sex. There is no meaningful mixing.

    • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Yeah which creates a division where all sane and sensible visions of sexuality are forbidden leaving only more extreme depictions from porn focused sites which race to extremes.

      I think it’s an unhealthy approach, we need sensible and loving eroticism to serve as a good example otherwise all we have is the absurdity of porn - I’m no prude and not al all against fetish porn or whatever as long as it’s consensual and safe but objectification and extremism don’t make healthy relationships or happy lives (not say they can’t be part of a great relationship but they dont work as the basis for it)

      • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        Yes, you get, tge few depictions tgat remain are either empty allusions to sex or grotesque, farcicsl refetences.the real thing is absent. It ends at, largely inaccessible movies almost only about love and then nothing and then parody like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_qj8cSk38o&t=210 And we know the people who excised that middle portion and I don’t understand why we let them get away with it.