• Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    Now we are getting off topic, but no I don’t. You can run through the Muslim countries and they either are too small to supply troops or are large enough, but want nothing to do with Palestinians. It’s an important question in that peacekeepers will surely be needed in the future. It’s should be part of aa plan Bibi doesn’t have.

    • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      There’s more than Arab or Muslim member states on the UN Security Council.

      Of course he doesn’t have a plan with the UN, they consider them hamas members

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        You won’t get EU countries, they have their own worries. Ya know, all you want to do is be right. Sorry, but this isn’t a reasonable discussion. It’s you taking offense. See ya later.

        • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I don’t want the US and world to continue enabling a genocide.

          Again it makes so much sense that you can’t find the reasoning or evidence you want

          • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            First of all enabling isn’t the word you want in the context you provided. Isreal would still be doing what they are doing without the US.

            You cannot provide one country that would provide peacekeepers, but you criticize me.