Justices Limit Power of Federal Agencies, Imperiling an Array of Regulations
www.nytimes.com
A foundational 1984 decision had required courts to defer to agencies’ reasonable interpretations of ambiguous statutes, underpinning regulations on health care, safety and the environment.

This is what the decision by the Republican justices to allow “gratuities” for public officials creates an incentive for.

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
    16·
    4 months ago

    Why is it that the right thinks science and expertise is an opinion?

    They work off belief and faith, that’s what religion is. So they project that everyone else thinks and works the same way, aka they think science is a belief and faith. It’s always projection.

    • thefartographer@lemm.ee
      11·
      4 months ago

      It’s never been about belief or faith. This goes back to the tobacco lobby when progressives were considered progressive because they followed the advice and research of experts. Conservatives couldn’t get away with doing whatever they wanted to do because progressives had facts and evidence to back up their platforms. While progressives were relying on input from third-party think tanks, conservatives invented their own think tanks by buying off professors from prestigious universities who needed more money and were willing to write bad-faith research.

      Conservatives don’t believe in anything other than money, power, and self-indulgence—they just muddied the waters enough to make facts and research look questionable. Finally, when people point to facts and figures, conservatives can point to their own tainted research and pretend like they believe their own lies.

      • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
        3·
        4 months ago

        It’s a bit simpler. Those facts, evidence, research, and experts? The religious right thinks that’s all faith and belief, because that’s how they work. That’s really what they think. It’s mind boggling but that’s what they think.