A bipartisan group of senators introduced a new bill to make it easier to authenticate and detect artificial intelligence-generated content and protect journalists and artists from having their work gobbled up by AI models without their permission.

The Content Origin Protection and Integrity from Edited and Deepfaked Media Act (COPIED Act) would direct the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to create standards and guidelines that help prove the origin of content and detect synthetic content, like through watermarking. It also directs the agency to create security measures to prevent tampering and requires AI tools for creative or journalistic content to let users attach information about their origin and prohibit that information from being removed. Under the bill, such content also could not be used to train AI models.

Content owners, including broadcasters, artists, and newspapers, could sue companies they believe used their materials without permission or tampered with authentication markers. State attorneys general and the Federal Trade Commission could also enforce the bill, which its backers say prohibits anyone from “removing, disabling, or tampering with content provenance information” outside of an exception for some security research purposes.

(A copy of the bill is in he article, here is the important part imo:

Prohibits the use of “covered content” (digital representations of copyrighted works) with content provenance to either train an AI- /algorithm-based system or create synthetic content without the express, informed consent and adherence to the terms of use of such content, including compensation)

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    LOL

    So I take your photo, remove your watermark, put my own watermark on it, and then I sue you for removing my watermark.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      Don’t be a fool. Of course, content corporations like Disney or the NYT are able to prove just when something was made.

      • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Don’t be a fool either.

        Of course I am going to do this to you, not to Disney etc. because I am way better at creating proof than you are.

        And of course Disney etc. are going to do this to you and me, because they are even better at creating proof than you and me are.

        That’s how foolish this law is.

      • Womble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        So what you’re saying is that this is a law designed to extend corporate control over information and culture even further?

        • General_Effort@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          This bill reads like it was written by Adobe.

          This provenance labelling scheme already exists. Adobe was a major force behind it. (see here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_Authenticity_Initiative ). This bill would make it so that further development will be tax-funded through organizations like DARPA.

          Of course, they are also against fair use. They pay license fees for AI training. For them, it means more cash flow.