• Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have no kids, but I have nieces, and also have enough empathy to be concerned for others’ children. Was genuinely concerned seeing how influential he was amongst boys / teen lads.

    It’s long past time to put serious checks & balances on social media. It’s literally ripping apart the fabric of our societies.

    • freemachine@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m wondering what it is that young males saw in him that they resonated with.

      I’m (anecdotally) guessing that there might be a recent lack of positive online discourse on masculinity because the positive role models might have become reluctant to participate because of the social climate that only the loud misguided ones like Tate become the “examples” of masculinity to look to in social media.

      • Isthisreddit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think a major factor is that many guys like the idea of dominance - it’s pretty fucking core in the brain of a primate. Another core “primatey” idea is that Women gravitate towards guys with power, wealth and leaders of the pack (the whole alpha males gets a harem concept - another thing that resonates with males). Tate’s idea of a leader-of-a-pack was being an asshole, and that’s the secret he was pushing, and the social media outrage machine helped unintentionally push to more eyes - at least that’s my take on it