It’s hard to imagine a less contentious or more innocent word than “and.”

But how to interpret that simple conjunction has prompted a complicated legal fight that lands in the Supreme Court on Oct. 2, the first day of its new term. What the justices decide could affect thousands of prison sentences each year.

Federal courts across the country disagree about whether the word, as it is used in a bipartisan 2018 criminal justice overhaul, indeed means “and” or whether it means “or.” Even an appellate panel that upheld a longer sentence called the structure of the provision “perplexing.”

The Supreme Court has stepped in to settle the dispute.

It’s the kind of task the justices — and maybe their English teachers — love. The case requires the close parsing of a part of a federal statute, the First Step Act, which aimed in part to reduce mandatory minimum sentences and give judges more discretion.

    • bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      The American militia was made up of ‘minutemen’ who could be ready for battle on a moment’s notice.

      This was just normal Americans with guns that decided to fight the british when it was possible.

      The same thing applies to normal gun owners now, although their effectiveness against a state military isn’t going to be nearly as much as before.