• piccolo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    deleted by creator

    • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      An LED is pretty damn simple and there’s no reason it would even be possible to control the voltage going to it. May as well worry about hackers finding a way to make a physical shutter transparent.

      • piccolo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        deleted by creator

    • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I dont know why few manufacturers dont just put a simple sliding shutter over the camera.

      There is an end user support concern with this. I prefer sliders, but users will put in tickets saying their camera doesn’t work.

      I still buy lenovo just for this professionally.

        • Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          that could work, or perhaps have a cut-out on the camera cover that blurs all light going in and has the words written on it “shutter closed” or something. Digital way built into the driver is probably easiest.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          My current work laptop has a shutter built in which heavily blurs the camera, so it’s relatively obvious why your camera isn’t working but you still get some level of privacy