And since you won’t be able to modify web pages, it will also mean the end of customization, either for looks (ie. DarkReader, Stylus), conveniance (ie. Tampermonkey) or accessibility.

The community feedback is… interesting to say the least.

    • ExFed@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Momentum. And it’s likely most people won’t be about to tell, or regularly run comparisons to find out for themselves. Theres enough value added to Chrome that people kind of assume it’s “the best” … It took me years to convince my boss to switch, but the one thing that did it for him was just that the PDF viewer is better in Firefox.

      People have weird preferences that don’t always line up with what software developers expect.

    • Kir@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      but isn’t Firefox itself basically paid by Google? I can’t see it as a threat to Google full control of the web

      • Nath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Google is their biggest donor. They pay $$$ to be the default search engine in Firefox.

        But Microsoft would happily give a not-insignificant amount to have Bing be the default search engine, and everyone knows it.

        It’s a symbiotic relationship. Google sorta need to pay up. Firefox needs the funding.

        Google does not control the running of Firefox.

        • ky56@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I thought Google funding Firefox was the cheapest way to fend off an antitrust issue?