The “Uncommitted” movement seeking a change in the Democratic Party’s approach to the war in Gaza on Thursday announced it is not ready to support Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris — while urging voters not to back Republican nominee Donald Trump or third-party candidates who could help Trump win the November election.

The “Uncommitted” group “opposes a Donald Trump presidency, whose agenda includes plans to accelerate the killing in Gaza while intensifying the suppression of anti-war organizing,” the statement continues. Additionally, the group is “not recommending a third-party vote in the Presidential election, especially as third party votes in key swing states could help inadvertently deliver a Trump presidency given our country’s broken electoral college system.”

  • Soup@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    And yet they refuse to support the one person that could keep him out of office.

    Fucking geniuses they are!

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      Israel has already slaughtered a full 10% of the population of Gaza.

      How many Palestinians will be left to save by the time Biden leaves office?

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Israel has already slaughtered a full 10% of the population of Gaza.

        idk why you put full here, i feel like just saying 10% would work just as well, seems more semantically confusing to me more than anything lol.

        I’m not sure what it’s trying to imply.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            maybe, i feel like you would just say “10%” or like you said “at least 10%” then, considering that numbers are like, really specific.

            If you weren’t being specific you would say something like “about 10%” implying somewhere around it, 7-13% probably.

            full just reads a little weirdly in that context.