• distantsounds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        No she didn’t. She’s just saying the same thing since the convention. It would be nice if she would commit to following US law and state there will be a halt to the weapon shipments

    • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Imagine treating an ethnic cleansing that we’re funding and arming as ‘annoying election rhetoric’ on your social media feed and then wondering why people equate you with the right…

      • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        And in 2 days nobody will care anymore, just like the immigrant caravan or half the other issues that only show up before elections.

        I’m perfectly fine with a rational debate about the issue, this is just stridency to disrupt any debate.

        • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          The migrant caravan was completely made up. The slaughter in Gaza has been happening for over a year with tens of thousands of innocent people blown to pieces and burned alive. Your opinion is disgusting and I see no reason to discuss with you any further.

          • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            And both will disappear tomorrow.

            The suits decide what we care about day to day, and you’re falling for it.

      • 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Do you really think you’re going to get a more favorable result under Trump than under Harris? They are both likely to continue supporting Israel – Harris for political reasons and Trump because Israel can easily funnel money into his businesses to effectively bribe him.

        So logically, if the result is identical either way, it becomes a non-issue in terms of who you vote for. You have to look to other issues in which there is actual differentiation in order to determine the best candidate.

        Any sane person knows genocide is awful and would love a candidate who is willing to stand up to Israel. Any logical person recognizes that we don’t have that luxury and must therefore cast our votes based on other critical factors, of which there are plenty.

        Supporting Harris does not equate to supporting Israel or their genocide.