• hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    By choice. The main developers don’t like that kind of gamification, bragging, karma farming and the negative aspects that come with such things.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      But it has other negative side effects if we scaled Lemmy up in scale.

      For example, it doesn’t matter if you downvote me if I called you a big stinky poo poo face. Because without a larger pool of karma to detract from, it doesn’t matter HOW unpopular any singular post is.

      …you big stinky poo poo face!

      • magnetosphere@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I think that’s how it should be. We all say stupid things sometimes (or smart but unpopular things). Plus, if someone had a bad few months, it shouldn’t haunt them forever.

        Keep Lemmy karma-free!

      • deranger@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Because without a larger pool of karma to detract from, it doesn’t matter HOW unpopular any singular post is.

        Voting is there to sort posts and comments, not to rate a user. Having a larger pool of karma serves no purpose.

        • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 hours ago

          The purpose is to rate the users. If you regularly contribute good quality content, you’ll have a high score.

          If you regularly engage in trolling, and harassment, and other shady activity, you get a negative score.

          Individual communities can set up guidelines, that if you have a new account under 6 months, and you have a negative overall karma, you’re banned from that community until a human can look through your post history to see if you should be unbanned.

          • Nah. Reddit showed that karma systems are useless as they are too easy to manipulate. Buy/hijack a bunch of old accounts and suddenly, your scams or crazy propaganda are given artificial authenticity. Or, just use repost bots to farm karma. Really, it was a nice idea but failed when subject to bad actors.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            The purpose is to rate the users.

            Individual communities can set up guidelines, that if you have a new account under 6 months, and you have a negative overall karma, you’re banned from that community until a human can look through your post history to see if you should be unbanned. you’ll have to repost previously highly upvoted content to pump up your karma numbers, until you have a positive overall karma.

            FTFY, I’d really prefer to leave that mistake of karma at Reddit instead of polluting Lemmy with it.

            Lemmy karma-less method also drastically reduces the value of bot accounts to farm karma (for nefarious or advertising use before being banned).

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Uı mın Reddit hæz ė mækſ impækt ðæt enı ƿu̇n poſt oṙ kȯment kæn hæv. Ȯbſtenſiblı æz æn æntı-brigeıdıŋ mejṙ b Uı’m luık 90% cṙ it ƿėz bikȯz v ð “Pride and Accomplishment” poſt frėm EA.

        spoiler

        I mean Reddit has a mac impact that any one post or comment can have. Obstensibly as an anti-brigading measure, but I’m like 90% sure it was because of the “Pride and Accomplishment” post from EA.