• Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can see from some of your other responses in here, including to me, that this is your go-to. It’s nothing more than an empty ad hominem to avoid actually addressing points. Sorry.

    You are dancing around like crazy. Every point I bring up, instead of you discussing it, you move on to something else about me, trying to kill the messenger.

    If you’re being intellectually honest, and if you actually have read some of my other posts, you’d see it’s definitely not an ad hominem, it’s actually what I believe in, so I express it often.

    I hate shills and bots, and corporations trying to redirect the narrative away from the truth to serve their own selfish needs, polluting the conversation.

    And when I see shills doing that, by signaling via some of their tells, I call them on it.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Every point I bring up, instead of you discussing it,

      Name the point I ignored. I’m happy to address the point.

      If you’re being intellectually honest, and if you actually have read some of my other posts, you’d see it’s definitely not an ad hominem, it’s actually what I believe in, so I express it often.

      Whether you believe it or not doesn’t change the fact that it’s, quite literally, an ad hominem. You might not realize it and it’s just a defense mechanism to avoid facing the fact that you can’t really defend your position. But it still is exactly that.

      And when I see shills doing that, by signaling via some of their tells, I call them on it.

      Correction: when you can’t actually defend your position, you just throw that out so you don’t actually have to defend your position.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Name the point I ignored. I’m happy to address the point.

        Honestly, at this point, I’d have to just point you back up to my first reply to your comment. You’ve moved the goalposts several times from when we started discussing WFH for employees (and not companies).


        You are using multiple argumentative techniques to not have to concede a point, and not being intellectually honest in this conversation. We’ve drifted FAR away from the original topic of WFH.

        At this point, I’d rather not waste any more of my time on this, but just instead point you back to our first comments and have you take a look at the like/dislike ratios, they are telling (though I’m sure you’re ignore/excuse those away as well).

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly, at this point, I’d have to just point you back up to my first reply to your comment. You’ve moved the goalposts several times from when we started discussing WFH for employees (and not companies).

          When given an opportunity to make your point, you offer up nothing but vagueness. You see what you hate in yourself in me, but I assure you you are really just seeing yourself.

          Also lol @ “like ratios” proving correctness.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You see what you hate in yourself in me, but I assure you you are really just seeing yourself.

            Lol!

            Whatever lets you sleep at night. Have a good day.