MataVatnik@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agoAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netimagemessage-square373fedilinkarrow-up11.15Karrow-down1181
arrow-up1965arrow-down1imageAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netMataVatnik@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square373fedilink
minus-squareareyouevenreal@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·20 hours agoYou can’t call nuclear dangerous when it’s literally safer than many other energy sources. It’s like calling Caffeine dangerous when meth exists.
minus-squarezero_spelled_with_an_ecks@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·20 hours agoCaffeine is dangerous and can kill humans in large doses AND meth exists. It’s not one or the other, genius. Please mainline some caffeine to prove your point. Meth exists, you’ll be fine.
You can’t call nuclear dangerous when it’s literally safer than many other energy sources. It’s like calling Caffeine dangerous when meth exists.
Caffeine is dangerous and can kill humans in large doses AND meth exists. It’s not one or the other, genius. Please mainline some caffeine to prove your point. Meth exists, you’ll be fine.