• nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I think they mean a single income household and being able to own a home

      • nifty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        That’s the first part, the second part is to have oversight to prevent corruption and mismanagement

    • RangerJosie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yes, but also what OP posted. When the women and minorities “knew their place” and the queer folks just didn’t exist in public.

      • nifty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        You’re right some people do think that way, and others are convinced to do so because they think their worsening economic situation is because of someone else’s better social situation, when in reality it’s greed and oligarchic socio-political rule which ruins it for everyone across the board.

    • callouscomic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Probably mostly for middle class white people. A pretty significant chunk of the population I think struggled to enjoy those benefits.

      • Homescool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        I don’t think about that because all of the culturally-produced content I have access to paints a steady picture of property and compliance. This is my mental model and my friends and I aren’t in the mood for a new story right now. ^^^/$