BadmanDan@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 21 hours agoKamala Harris won politicaly engaged voters, but lost voters who don't follow politics.www.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square98fedilinkarrow-up1298arrow-down116
arrow-up1282arrow-down1external-linkKamala Harris won politicaly engaged voters, but lost voters who don't follow politics.www.nbcnews.comBadmanDan@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 21 hours agomessage-square98fedilink
minus-squareEmpireInDecay@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down3·17 hours agoWhy is the default argument from liberals always ‘but Trump?’ Harris would have been a shit candidate not worthy of being elected regardless of who her opponent was.
minus-squarepearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down3·edit-215 hours agoThat doesn’t matter. She was the only other option we had
minus-squareEmpireInDecay@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·18 minutes agoShe was forced as the only choice on voters and liberals find that acceptable
minus-squareFreefall@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down2·15 hours agoBecause she wouldn’t have been shit. Your argument is invalid.
Why is the default argument from liberals always ‘but Trump?’ Harris would have been a shit candidate not worthy of being elected regardless of who her opponent was.
That doesn’t matter. She was the only other option we had
She was forced as the only choice on voters and liberals find that acceptable
Because she wouldn’t have been shit. Your argument is invalid.