• Blue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lying to yourself will not change reality. A cellphone will never be a low-resource type of communication. It is a matter of when, not if, it falls apart as an idea.

    Lying to yourself will not change reality. A personal computer will never be a low-resource type of device. It is a matter of when, not if, it falls apart as an idea.

    That is you, that is how deranged you sound.

    • Hypx@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      1 year ago

      A cellphone is not a car. Nor is a personal computer.

      A BEV has fundamental problems that cannot be solved. It’s worth noting that they are an older idea than combustion cars. It is in many ways, totally obsolete.

      • Blue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ok I stand corrected, you definitely are deranged or you are literally a paid shill of Exxon, which in this case would be the same thing.

        • Hypx@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So when Joe Biden announces a huge pro-hydrogen program, is he a paid shill of Exxon?

          Honestly, some of you guys are so deluded, it goes beyond projecting. You guys are seriously brainwashed by Musk. Some of you will sell out the entirety of the climate change movement if it means validation by a Fascist.

            • Hypx@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              Then explain the vast number of European politicians also supporting expansion of hydrogen? Are they all part of the fossil fuel lobby?

              • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes.

                The fossil fuel industry has enormous pockets. And politicians aren’t known to understand the technology they are peddling.

                • Hypx@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  “Everyone on the left is brainwashed by the oil companies. But me, supporting a position only held by one Fascist, is definitely not the crazy one here.”

                • Hypx@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The problem is that you have almost no one left on the left that actually supports your position. Not many scientists either.

          • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            lol we hate Musk. We dont like Teslas shitty cars. We do like EVs since they keep the air pollution outside of big cities and if used with renewable energies they are the best alternative to fossil fuel car travel we have.

              • Pipoca@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                The problem with FCEVs right now is cost.

                First of all, we already have good electric distribution infrastructure, but don’t have an industrially-sized hydrogen distribution infrastructure. It’s way easier to install a new charging site than a new hydrogen refueling site. Building hydrogen out will be expensive, unless you’re talking about vehicles with a centralized depot, like busses or ferries.

                Second, fuel cells aren’t really that efficient right now, and neither is electrolysis. Due to losses at each step, 100 miles worth of green hydrogen is way, way more expensive than 100 miles worth of electricity.

                With more research, that could change. But for now, there’s a reason you don’t see many FCEVs.

                • Hypx@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The same story was said about wind, solar, even BEVs too. They all had to be expensive before they hit mass production.

                  But the advantage of FCEVs is that they have very low resource requirements. The cost floor is much below that of BEVs. Eventually, they will be as cheap as ICE cars or less, and the fuel will be cheaper than gasoline.

                  The efficiency argument is hugely exaggerated and is mostly coming from BEV companies. Even if you believe it, you should be aware that photovoltaics are terribly inefficient. But it doesn’t matter because solar is made from sand and sunlight is everywhere. Hydrogen has the same idea going for it. Made from water and renewable energy, it too will be extremely cheap.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Funny, cause an combustion car has a lot bigger issues that can not be fixed and need to be addressed right now.

        Which shares the same problems with hydrogen cars, btw.

        • Hypx@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          FCEVs don’t have the problem of combustion cars. It is the natural follow-up to them.