• ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    The fluoride added to water gets it up to 0.7mg/liter.

    That ends up to be 2 or 3 drops in a 55 gallon drums worth of water. Not much.

    Fluoride is a natural substance and is found in many areas drinking water already. Many areas in much higher concentrations than 0.7mg/liter, so realistically people all over the world have drank fluoridated water for thousands of years.

    You have to well over double the 0.7 before any health issues may appear and the first to appear is at about triple the concentration in kids under 8 years old who drink it for years getting spots on their teeth. The spots are only superficial.

    Going into concentrations even higher than that CAN cause health issues when drank for longer periods of time. All of those cases being from naturally occurring fluoride, which actually effects somewhere north of 20% of the world’s population.

    Which makes the argument that fluoride in our water keeps us passive as being extra stupid, since water sourced around Columbia (the country) is far higher than .07mg/liter and Columbia seems to be caught in violence and turmoil and instability quite a bit over the decades.

    *edit: Colombia

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      5 days ago

      Its presence in groundwater is how we discovered it’s good for teeth.

      In fact, there used to be so much in some areas,it actually stained the teeth. In Colorado Springs a dentist noticed that the children were developing brown stains on their teeth. In researching it, it was discovered that the “Colorado Brown Stain” was caused by excessive fluoride in the drinking water. But it also lead to the discovery that regions with natural fluoride present but in lower levels than Colorado Springs didn’t have stained teeth, but did have lower levels of tooth decay.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yep. In fact, 21% of the world’s natural drinking water used falls within the recommended range for fluoride, while over another 20% is higher and in some countries actually does cause some non-superficial side effects and problems. Those don’t pop up until in concentrations at least 3 times higher than recommended.

    • Reyali@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 days ago

      Small note: the country name is spelled “Colombia,” and spelling it correctly means you don’t need to specify which one!

    • BussyCat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Just because a concentration is low doesn’t mean it’s safe. Water with 0.7 mg/L of Po-210 is lethal.

      You can put an amount of it in a 55 gallon drum that is not visible

      It’s a natural substance

      Fluoride is in fact safe at the amounts that the FDA regulates but saying it’s a small concentration or that it’s natural are not the reasons it’s safe. It’s the hundreds of peer reviewed research articles that show that it’s safe