It’s come up in the github issues before, but I was wondering if anyone had any positive or negative thoughts about the general idea.
I say microblogging, but it would not need to be micro at all, as many/most fediverse platforms don’t bother with the (IMO silly) small character limit default in mastodon.
The feature is probably better described as a “personal feed”, where the primary agent is another user not a community.
I’ve thought about it and come to believe that I would rather like a platform that is lemmy + a microblogging interface/integration.
How it’s implement and how viably I don’t know. But in terms of design I have the following thoughts:
- It would feel natural to treat users much like communities (with one post author) and the “microblog feed” just like the current lemmy feed but of followed/subscribed users’ posts.
- In addition to
Subscribed, Local, All, you’d havePersonalsorBlogs. - Each user would then have their own “Personal Community”, which they could post to like any other. They’d also have moderation controls over it too, which might be a nice addition to the microblogging platform space.
- Unlike mastodon, replies/comments wouldn’t appear in the feed, as all replies would be available only once you view a post, which, I think, would be a wonderful way to organise microblogging content.
- A “boost/retweet” behaviour could be treated as a cross-post from one personal community to another, except you’d probably want to enable such a “cross-post” be applicable to a comment, which would be congruent with the more free-form nature of “microblogging”.
- You’d want to keep the sorting algorithms, which combined with being able to view only the top-level posts, would again I think be a nice way to handle a “microblogging” feed.
- Being able to create lists or multi-communities, as has been requested ordinary lemmy, would be very useful for microblogs.
- Following a microblogging account would obviously just create+subscribe to a “personal community” representing that account. Following a lemmy user account would involve subscribing to their personal community, which would exist by default.
- You’d probably want to make it as easy as possible in the UI to post links between the microblogging and community “interfaces”, so that they could cross-pollinate each other, which, in the case of lemmy users, would be quite nice as any link from one “side” to the other would drop right in a native interface where you can immediately comment/reply or vote etc.
Potential issues I can see:
- Implementation is likely more difficult than I realise
- DB sizes could potentially blow up with a whole bunch of microblog content from mastodon?
- Posting to and engaging with the microblog side might distract many users away from engaging in communities. I suspect that this is a real but minor concern, especially if some improvements come to the communites side of lemmy (eg, multi-communities, the “best” algorithm, making it easier to search through subscribed communities).
- Some thought would probably have to be given to how to deal with mastodon privacy measures like the no-index option and limits on following etc.
Beyond all of that, my impression of such a platform, should it ever come to be, is that it would be awesome, not just because of the fusion of two formats, but because presenting “microblogs” within the lemmy structure and with lemmy features would bring a number of improvements over something like mastodon: longer posts, markdown, post/comment organisation, feed sorting, search, and direct/native interaction between communities and microblogs. I can see it becoming natural to treat your lemmy(+mblog) account as a quick blogging platform (ie, writing longer posts because you can on lemmy), and cross-posting to the appropriate communities while enjoying that your direct followers will also get the post in their feed. Though this does raise an interesting question about whether following a lemmy user, which would entail getting all of their posts to everything, should also be enabled as a separate option from just following their “personal community”?
Thoughts?
Do one thing and do that excellent.
Sure but a more generic ActivityPub instance implementation and client API with good support for both Mastodon-style microblogging and Lemmy-style group discussions (and FEP-400e if that goes anywhere or whatever else people settle on) can easily fit within the “one thing”. There is a ton of overlap between the two and I am pretty sure such implementations will emerge eventually.
That already exists, its called Kbin.
Yep
One of the oldest fediverse platforms, friendica, a sort of Facebook alternative, has had groups and a normal personals feed for ages and happily interacts with both lemmy and mastodon.
This proposal isn’t some alien whacky idea, it’s pretty natural and mostly involves extending things rather than adding some brand new feature.
If I want to microblog, I will use Mastodon.
Counterpoints:
- What about people that really don’t want to have separate accounts and platforms, especially for two not that distantly related activities (surely at some point it’s all “social media”)
- The split between mastodon and lemmy in terms of their ability to effectively federate with each other is splitting people and conversations/discussions that don’t need to be. It’s not people who don’t want to talk to each other it’s people who can’t because they’re stuck on a particular platform/app. If you’re worried about “twitter culture”, that seems to be a seriously moot point as mastodon and the wider “microblogging” fediverse is a very different place, and intentionally so.
It’s not a feature I would be interested in, otherwise I would have joined Kbin or Mastodon instead. As long as I have the option to not see it, I wouldn’t mind it being added. Like as long as I can just choose to not subscribe to those feeds.
Mastodon exists. It’s pretty good. Using 2 apps is fine.
2 apps is fine, but not good. And for an ecosystem like the fediverse which has other pain points, leaning into its strengths rather than simply expecting users to make things work multiple apps etc, is probably a good idea.
I’m not suggesting all platforms/apps be all things to all people. But treating groups and users as essentially equivalent sources of feeds seems like a reasonable expectation for enabling good interop across the fediverse.
