Lubbock County, Texas, joins a group of other rural Texas counties that have voted to ban women from using their roads to seek abortions.

This comes after six cities and counties in Texas have passed abortion-related bans, out of nine that have considered them. However, this ordinance makes Lubbock the biggest jurisdiction yet to pass restrictions on abortion-related transportation.

During Monday’s meeting, the Lubbock County Commissioners Court passed an ordinance banning abortion, abortion-inducing drugs and travel for abortion in the unincorporated areas of Lubbock County, declaring Lubbock County a “Sanctuary County for the Unborn.”

The ordinance is part of a continued strategy by conservative activists to further restrict abortion since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade as the ordinances are meant to bolster Texas’ existing abortion ban, which allows private citizens to sue anyone who provides or “aids or abets” an abortion after six weeks of pregnancy.

The ordinance, which was introduced to the court last Wednesday, was passed by a vote of 3-0 with commissioners Terence Kovar, Jason Corley and Jordan Rackler, all Republicans, voting to pass the legislation while County Judge Curtis Parrish, Republican, and Commissioner Gilbert Flores, Democrat, abstained from the vote.

  • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    So in principle, if you get sued over this by an abusive spouse, he could:

    • Never tell you

    • Hide the mail

    • Show up to court that day and you don’t

    • Cackle maniacally as the judge signs a bench warrant for his victim’s arrest she doesn’t know about

    • He now can get her thrown in jail whenever she acts up, e.g. runs away or fights back

    • The legal system is now his personal army


    And we pretend that democracy, rule of law and the legal system is supposed to be capable of protecting innocent people from abusers and preventing tyranny. We pretend it was ever even able to, let alone willing.

    We obviously need something better.

      • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        No means yes and yes means harder.

        Abusers will just lie and tell the judge they gave notice and the courts never listen when defendants claim they never got any. It’s always assumed to be a lie, hence bench warrants.

        Or just threaten her or otherwise stop her from showing up. Bonus points if he slips opiates into her drink, she passes out and misses the court date, and he then accuses her of being a drug addict.

        You really don’t know anything about how abuse works if you’re seriously questioning this.