• Cataphract@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    This is rather pedantic and obfuscates the reality and consumer rights. Don’t shill for big corp with that narrative, you could argue you don’t “own” a book either if we’re just doing silly talk in here.

    • dufkm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Devil’s advocate: you obviously own the physical media that constitutes the book, but do you really “own” the contents of the book if you’re not allowed by law to make a million copies of it and sell them?

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Who gives a fucking shit about this nonsense? I just want games I paid for to work after the developer stops supporting them.

        Maybe you don’t, because you’re a moron.

    • pixelscript@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      You don’t, though. Or rather, you don’t own its contents. It’s not being pedantic, it’s simply correct.

      This isn’t a perspective shilling for big corp. If anything, understanding that society has already sleepwalked into a post-ownership era long ago, and that technology has only just now appeared to let the logical conclusion of that come home to roost, should only increase one’s unease of mass unchecked corporate ownership.

      • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        You can’t buy a book, copy it, and profit from those copies because you don’t own the IP. But you own the book for your personal use (and you can lend or sell it) in perpetuity, without any dependence on whoever sold it to you. That last part is no longer possible in the digital world with games that are architected specifically so that core functionality is server-side only.

        • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Like with pirating, it was always an issue of expense. They could legally take away your disk at any time and force you to uninstall the software from your computer. It just would never be worth it to go after any specific individuals for any minor infraction of the license. Digital licensing just made them capable of doing that with the press of a button.

      • Quadhammer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        society has already sleepwalked into a post-ownership era

        Nah fuck that. If we’re paying for shit we’re going to use it when and how we want it. Right to repair is in this same vein

        • pixelscript@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          It seems I’m miscommunicating. I’m being interpreted as saying, “We’re already here, and this is fine actually.” My point is “We’ve been on the setup for ages, you shouldn’t be surprised this is where we are going without intervention, and we need to intervene right now”.

          The world hasn’t slowly built up to being this bad. They’ve been laying the traps for a long time. We’re in the late game, not the early game. There is a lot to undo.