- cross-posted to:
- fuck_ai@lemmy.world
- cross-posted to:
- fuck_ai@lemmy.world
You must log in or register to comment.
Oh no is the widdle data thief mad his stolen data was stolen?
Someone call the waaambulance.
that’s fine, from what I understand AI projects can’t have copyright so even if the claim is true they can cry about it.
See, so when they steal from US, it’s fine. But when someone steals from THEM, suddenly we have a problem 🖕
Little known rule of society: it’s OK to steal from people poorer than you.
That’s the free market at work baby. Regs for thee but not for mee.
I don’t believe any of these assholes about anything tbh.
Oh cry me a river, DeepSeek is OpenSource, OpenAI (Which should be renamed to ClosedAI) isn’t
DeepSeek is the more ethical AI toolkit for one to use, at least they’re not pretentious
DeepSeek is Open Weight, as in weights are available*
Anything needed to actually train the model is as closed as ClosedAI is.
Oh noooo!
Anyway.
Before reading any articles concerning Deep Seek’s origin, it took me awhile to realise that they probably stole the data and technology from Western AI developers. Developing a better AI and as open source that quickly is pretty much impossible. And everyone knows that CCP steal IP and technology from the West so it’s unsurprising.
You do realized that’s based as hell right?
China steals from the west and uses it to improve their peoples lives instead of just squeezing them for every filthy penny possible?
You do understand that’s a moral, ethical, and economic China W don’t you?
What happened in Tianamen in 1989, Deep Seek?
so because openAI stole their corpus of training info first, they get to call others thieves?
lol…
It’s still stealing regardless of who called dibs first.
I don’t disagree at all. I think there’s going to be a reckoning when one of these companies finally makes a product that earns a profit.
Spoiler - It’ll be a Chinese company.
“It’s only okay if western companies steal.” duh!
There’s a name for that. It’s called “karma”.
But, DeepSeek wouldn’t be able to make money without using OpenAI.
Same what OpenAI said about copyright material they used to train ChatGPT.
Felony contempt of business model
This is a “not the onion” level headline, holy shit
-> <-
If you zoom in on the line above, and I mean really zoom in you will see a violin small enough to express my level of sympathy.
Do we even have to technology to zoom in that much? 😂
They do on CSI.
Of course we do, you just need to keep on zooming!
I’m giving it all the zoom we got but that’s all we have!
i’m at 1200000% zoom and i can’t see it!?
Keep going! It’s almost visible!
Weird, because OpenAI used my work, without permission, to create an AI that stealing my job.
It’s fine when we do it!
The bots stole our jobs, then the other bots stole the jobs from the first bots.
Cry me a river.
Inconceivable.
