House Democratic lawmakers reportedly used a closed-door meeting earlier this week to vent their frustrations with progressive advocacy groups that have been driving constituent calls and pressuring the party to act like a genuine opposition force in the face of the Trump administration’s authoritarian assault on federal agencies and key programs.

  • ameancow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    4 hours ago

    We need a Democratic Tea Party movement very badly.

    Unfortunately, I already know the people who would lead it would also never get past making the rules of who’s included, what kind of tea we’ll be using, and if it’s ethically sourced, and if any members have any problematic tweets in their past, what particular brand of socialism everyone subscribes to, and of course, what we’re actually demanding from the government.

    Say what you want about the right, but their superficial, Ork-like focus on goals gets them moving. Too bad those goals are usually things like “Vote against our best interests as much as humanly possible.”

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I dont think we want to brand off anything related to tea. Lets call it the people’s party.

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Nah that name gives off Democratic People’s Republic of Korea/People’s Republic of China vibes.

    • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The left won’t big-tent: if you aren’t perfect and addressing their issue du jour, well, good luck. I don’t know how you make a progressive party if there is no ability to prioritize.

      And by the way I get it, if I wasn’t allowed to exist, I would sure as shit want my issue at the front of the line too.

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The left will happily big-tent to a point, but we’re not about to include people who directly attack the party platform, and we need to throw out those shits when we find them-- the liebermans, bidens, sinemas, and fettermans. We need to get back to having a party platform, which the current democratic party doesnt really. We also cant belly up to AIPACs udder like the other parties did or we’ll be right back where we started.

        • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 minutes ago

          Yeah I don’t think that’s as true as you’d like to think. It’s not even about accepting outsiders, it’s purely about agreeing what issue to tackle first. Seeems to me there’s a really strong vibe of “I’m in if it’s my issue” and protesting “what about my issue?!” when it’s not. No concept of eating one bite at a time even though that’s how the work gets done.