• psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      A monopoly is thought to inspire creation, if that’s so IP is good, but should be on human timescales.

      100 years of monopoly won’t inspire me any better than 20 years, and even most cooperate products have less time in production than that

    • Evilsandwichman [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It was so hard for me to grasp at some point over a decade earlier that in the past, in the middle ages and earlier for example, that people would publish all these educational books…and none of the info was copyrighted; literally anyone could find some book published by some random Greek or Arab person and just take all the knowledge, and release their own stuff that just freely builds on the knowledge contained within, or that inventions could be copied by anyone and no one was like ‘pay me for my brilliance’.

      • jadero@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yes, but it’s important to remember that a much (most?) of that work was performed by those with hereditary wealth, under the patronage of those with hereditary wealth, under the patronage of the church, or by clergy who had plenty of free time beyond their duties and no separate need to earn income for housing and food. In fact, one reason to enter the clergy was to gain access to the resources to pursue other activities.

      • Cowbee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Absolutely. Free flow of information without pay wall allows humanity to collectively build upon itself.