This made me chuckle

Is this what’s meant by the null hypothesis?

I need to rewatch that series

That read made me feel better about myself, thank you for that. The imposter syndrome demon tries to pester us all from time to time.

Eh, depends. If it’s the around-the-neck kind of crystals, no way. If it’s in a radio circuit, now, that’s a different story.

That was terrifying

I would be sad about leaving either, with full blown buyer’s remorse for the other one. So knowing me, and agreeing with the other commenters about taking only memories, I’d probably opt to leave both and smile that I found them.

Great, now that song is going to be in my head all day

wtf this is just objective truth. why are you posting this to the shitposting com?

based

And with that, FiskFisk33 was enlightened.

Certainly, I don’t disagree with that at all. And that’s likely part of the reason so few people publish failures, because there’s no “reward”. All I was saying is there’s still value there.

I wish more people would publish their failures. Definitive proof that a hypothesis is wrong is just as solid a result as definitive proof the hypothesis is right.

I hate that I can’t photosynthesize.

our our

Ok but a soda or carbonated water that has lost most of its target fizzyness quotient (scientific term) is still regarded as being flat even if it has some carbonation left. If it were a sliding scale instead of “a” vs “b”, then we could imagine a “locally flat” taste profile while admitting that the whole is not entirely flat. Which is a perfect description of Earth’s geometry.

I learned cursory electronics and circuits in my physics curriculum.

FULL BRIDGE RECTIFIER

Being a lit review, it’s not a referreed publication, so no one to call them out on their bullshit. Funny that the author didn’t even bother reading their shit sandwich of a “review”.