Sexual aggression is illegal in the UK? That sounds pretty boring, ngl.

I don’t think you understand how insurance works.

Do you have to support all of a nation’s laws in order to support said nation? E.g. can you patriotically protest a law you think is unconstitutional?

Cities are trash now, this will only make them worse because corporations are stupid. The new process will look like this:

1. Buy plot of land.
2. Build business without adequate parking.
3. People park on the street, which will remain mysteriously legal but exacerbate the same disasters street parking already causes.
4. Even with that, parking is insufficient. Business goes belly-up, causing urban blight.
5. New investor goes to Step 1.

Chiropracty isn’t “scientific”.

We could always embrace capitalism by getting rid of corporations, like as a concept. They’re a fundamentally anti-capitalist idea.

Does it count as a tell when it’s irrelevant? Everything Trump says is a lie. You can tell he’s lying because his lips are moving. The addition of the word “Sir” doesn’t change anything.

It’s fine, provided it’s not a plot hole - i.e. your fantasy setting needs to not have abolished blindness as a realistic malady, which some settings do. E.g. LOTR 100% has blind people, while the Harry Potter universe only has very poor blind people, since solving blindness is as trivial as a polyjuice potion, even if nothing else works (and something more effective is bound to work).

The government can ban tobacco, but it’s undeniably tyrannical to ban a drug because you don’t like the consequences people are choosing for themselves.

He couldn’t remember if he did or not, is the joke.

Speaking as someone who knows the definition (or more accurately, that there isn’t one), it is not a first amendment issue.

They do, in fact, have a legal leg to stand in. As shareholders, they can sue their board of directors for mismanagement.

Gerrymandering is legal, as is mentioned in the article. What’s not legal is racial gerrymandering. If all a court does is find a map to be gerrymandered, it won’t send it to anyone to be redrawn.

Banning specific guns is pure theater, even if it passes. There’s zero real safety in it.

There is roughly $2.6 trillion dollars in untaxed earnings being held overseas in order to avoid taxation.

This is false. There are zero dollars in untaxed earnings.

Lemmings in several subs, this one included, seem to reliably comment on content they haven’t actually read. It’s bizarre.

It is making mistakes, not lying. To lie it must believe it is telling falsehoods, and it is not capable of belief.

The Netherlands don’t have freedom of speech, though, so that’s immaterial. The closest thing they have is Article 7, Subarticle 3 in general, which only means they can’t legally be compelled to seek prior approval for speech.

Well, of course not. What you’ll do is come to America illegally because the legal method won’t work.

It’s just like how the GOP tries as hard as it can to maximize abortions by limiting access to contraceptives: this is an attempt to maximize illegal immigration by making legal immigration less and less of a real prospect. The GOP would much rather any immigrant be illegal than legal - e.g. because they can then pretend this problem is caused by Biden and use it in their rhetoric.

No, they said what they were referring to: AFP saying things without confirmation.