Glad you got it sorted

No, because I don’t agree with their methods… Just like any extremist group might have a good message but doesn’t mean I agree with them bombing oil pipelines or kidnapping people

Attacking rocks does nothing to progress their cause… Attacking things in the environment doesn’t even line up with their cause of wanting to protect the environment

As long as they stick to actually attacking the companies and groups that actually are the cause of the problems, I would support their methods and as a result, them as a group

So are caves, yet humans can very easily cause damage to them accidentally, let alone deliberately

If their message was anti whaling and they cut down trees as well as sabotaged boats, would you be “well they attack boats too so that’s fine”?

I never once said I disagree with their message, but doesn’t mean I need to agree with their methods

If their message is that oil is bad and that government should be doing more, they should be targeting oil companies, lobbyists, government officials, companies that have excess waste and chemical use (coke im looking at you)… Not heritage listed stuff that’s mostly maintained by volunteers

Going after a painting that’s behind glass is VERY different to going after the stone henge that has no protective layer, and most importantly of all, has nothing to do with the target of their cause

saying it destroyed the stone henge is a major exaggeration, saying it did no damage is also just as wrong. The English heritage society emphasised that it was only no VISIBLE damage left, however they also said it did cause damage.

It’s just like how you can’t touch walls in caves because any change in the oils and stuff in our skins can cause long term damage even though there’s no immediate visible damage

Samsung messages was using RCS since 2012… Years before Google messages adopted it.

There are others out there that use it but call it by different names like “advanced messaging”, “SMS+” etc

Google was the first to add e2e encryption and push it hard though, but if you send a RCS message from Google messages to Samsungs messages app, it won’t have e2e, and most likely will be the same with messaging Apple.

But given how much Apple have fought to make it hard (or at least inconvenient) to message between them, and shut down any apps that made messaging between Apple and Android better, this is a big step for Apple

It’s been a while since I used my resin printer, but I had a similar problem at one point and it came down to the support connection to the print… No matter how many supports I put, it didn’t change the outcome, but when I made the support thicker and made the connection point thicker, suddenly I had no more problems… It just meant a little extra post processing on some parts

My guess is similar to Intel XeSS where that’s pretty much what it does, runs the game at lower resolution and uses the npu to upscale it in real-time

https://game.intel.com/us/xess-enabled-games/

The biggest difference that this might bring is IF it can work with any game rather than just specific ones

If you ever dive into the filth that is r/conservative, you’ll see that this has just reenforced their views that he needs to win and they need to do anything to make that happen…I don’t think there’s anything that could snap that cult out of it at this point

He’s had to shell out for both to appeal them… The first I believe he put up cash, the second he used properly as a bond

In other words, a big customer finally got effected

31 days*

Well the reason I asked about the hotend was because of you’re using the little glass bead version of the thermistor, and the hotend has the hole to feed through, I had an issue on an old Frankenstein ender where it wasn’t touching the metal inside correctly… As it heated up, it would kind of move the thermistor away from the metal. I solved this by putting a DIY metal shroud on it that held it in the middle while touching the hotend all around. I also used thermal paste to make sure there was no gaps.

220+ hours of game play is WAY past the refund period of 2 hours

The first time you ask for a refund, the bot with auto decline it based off hours, the second time on it gets a human review. If you keep applying, eventually you’ll get someone to approve it, and it’ll help if you use the script given in the Twitter thread

Here let me fix that for you

EU: demands changes to allow non-verifiable software

Apple: disagrees, but allows it does half assed job to try and make regulations look bad for its users

platform browser less secure

TheRegister: Damned Apple!!

I changed the thermistor “sensor type” from “EPCOS 100K B57560G104F” (same as the bed) to “Generic 3950”, no change.

What actual thermistor are you using?

Also since I’m half asleep and too lazy to read the previous posts to see if you listed it, what motherboard and hotend

Shitter gave them the authority when they signed an agreement saying they would do the very thing you’re upset Australia is asking them to do

Either they never should have signed, should announce publically that they no longer support and no longer wish to be a signatory to the statement, or should abide.

They can’t sign things saying they will do everything to help remove these videos globally, and then get upset the first time someone asks them to. It doesn’t matter if it’s Australia or another party to the agreement, they agreed to it.

So if shitter didn’t think it was appropriate, why did they ever sign saying they agreed to it?

This was a terrorist act, it’s violent videos, no self respecting platform would want that content on there anyway, and why is it that shitter is the only platform that has a problem with this one?

The other platforms all took it down without even needing to be asked

Yes Australia doesn’t have a great history when it comes to censorship, but musk is a deplorable human for fighting this one and it’s a strange hill to die on

Yes but you seem to be mixing up 2 parts of their statements … The one you linked is paywalled so I’m not sure if it’s what’s saying it, but if you look at their original statement, the scale back and the 2.4km were two seperate parts

They expect 2.4km to be completed by 2030

They scaled back the total excepted population from 1.5m to 300k

That means the total excepted length should still be much longer than 2.4km because I believe it’s still expected to connect to the airport which is over 10km from the current stage