In the wake of his 17-year jail sentence, Joseph Bigg said: “Oh, I know he’ll pardon. I believe that with all my heart.”

  • Plap plap 𓁑𓂸 @lemmyf.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    1 年前

    Regardless of political leanings, if one of the steps in your master plan is “receive pardon from glorious leader once they return to power”, you might want to rethink what you’re about to do.

      • Railing5132@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 年前

        Oh, I completely agree on that point. But let them fade into the dark where cockroaches belong and stop giving them free advertising for their gofundme accounts!

  • akai@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 年前

    I’d pay good money to see his face the moment he realizes that Trump isn’t going to help him

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 年前

    He thought Trump was gonna pay their lawyers as well.

    Not the sharpest tool in the shed this one.

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    1 年前

    Dude, he’s already forgotten about you, if he ever knew who you were in the first place. He most certainly doesn’t care if you rot in jail or not. In fact, he’d probably get off on it if he knew.

    • xantoxis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 年前

      If someone told Trump about this guy 4 years from now, he’d be bragging about how there were dudes doing long jailtime for him, because that’s how great he is. Getting Biggs out of prison would mean less bragging rights. He literally has an incentive to keep him in there.

    • qyron@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 年前

      We have it here as well but it isn’t a free for all. The President receives a list of proposed pardons that have to be vetted one by one by a legal team. Certain offenses are not eligible and only sentences below a given number of years may be pardoned.

      It’s not like the man can hand out pardons on a whim.

      How does it work in the US?

      • CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 年前

        How does it work in the US?

        Generally, the pardon power is meant to be a check on the legislative and judicial branch, and thus it is designed to be this powerful.

        Obama used his pardon power to free individuals who were nonviolent drug offenders who got sentenced to years often for simple possession. This doesn’t mean that he didn’t use a slew of lawyers to find these cases. He very much did. But he could, literally, go through a roster of inmates and just pick random people to pardon.

        Trump, if reelected, will likely pardon himself and it will need to go through the courts to see if that’s even feasible. Given the current nature of our highest court, it likely will be found constitutional.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 年前

          Given the current nature of our highest court, it likely will be found constitutional.

          Pretty much. From the strict text reading there is nothing about it.

          and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

          Justice Thompson will get a new boat from a GOP aligned group so at least so it isn’t all bad. Sure it is travesty of the justice and breaks the entire concept of no one being above or below the law but when has that stopped the Robert’s court before?

      • xantoxis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 年前

        Nobody knows, including the president. Trump thought he could pardon himself. There aren’t any restrictions other than it must be a crime with federal jurisdiction, the only jurisdiction over which the president has direct power. He can even pardon people in advance.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 年前

        It is very open for abuse but historically hasn’t been abused that much. Seems like the states are moving towards making it less powerful.

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 年前

          The US seems to work on “I pinky swear not to abuse this” and then is shocked when that turns out poorly.

          • jcit878@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 年前

            sometimes when these systems are designed, the designers, simply didnt contemplate the crazy shit people will try that are within the systems legal bounds. for example no-one would have ever thought a prime minister would secretly swear himself into multiple minister portfolios even behind his own cabinets back, but thats exactly what the former PM of australia did (and now calls into question the things he signed off on in secret at the time).

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 年前

            You need a balance. You can’t have a government that can’t respond/change and you can’t have a government where whomever won the last election is now dictator whose whim is law.

            A lot of this stuff was ripe for abuse since the beginning but it was only rarely abused so everyone just left it. Kinda how Vietnam war wasnt declared but went on for like a decade. The potential for that abuse of power was there since the founding days but wasn’t abused until much later.

            As I said the states seem like they are moving away from it being an unchecked power so maybe one day there will be a constitutional amendment.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 年前

    Trump could have pardoned him on January 7th.

    Trump doesn’t give a shit about them.

    Also, Trump is about to get removed from the ballot in several states.

    • Maeve@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 年前

      “Also, Trump is about to get removed from the ballot in several states.”

      I hope you’re correct.

    • Railing5132@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 年前

      I wouldn’t count on the 14th argument. There’s going to be so many lawsuits flying around they’re going to have to put a jetway at the Supreme Court, and Alito, Kavanaugh, Thomas, and whatsherface will tie themselves in knots to force that shitstain back on us.

  • Hazdaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 年前

    If there weren’t a million reasons to not vote for Trump already, keeping this POS behind bars is just one more to add to the pile.

  • Surp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 年前

    Lol trump only cares about himself this dudes in for a wild ride. Don’t drop the soap my man.

  • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 年前

    I’m guessing, because he’s clearly a moron, that he doesn’t realize that former presidents don’t have pardoning power.